Muslim Ban 2.0 — Hinderaker: “Bullet-Proof”; My Reaction? “[Another] Dead-Letter”

Well. . . over some delicious miso soup and sashimi, at lunch — it took me all of five minutes to read — and re-read — the “new” order.

The problem 45 faces is. . . simply insurmountable. His own very public statements, along with (notably) those of Rudy Giuliani cannot be washed away. They are powerful evidence of a violation of the First, and Fourteenth, Amendments. Once “rung” — in the poetic language of the Supremes — that bell cannot be “unrung“.

[But Mr. Hinderaker — ever an ideologue — thinks it “bullet-proof“. Hilarious!] In any event, here is Mr. Trump, verbatim, then:

. . . .December 7, 2015: We will have a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on. . . .

That is the evidence — and no amount of lipstick on this pig will. . . suffice.

The “Three Day Condor” predicts this new order will suffer the same fate as the first one. And that will be. . . a victory for our federalized (republic) system of checks and balances, for the US Constitution, for our democracy, and ordered liberty. More than 240 years of US history hangs in the balance here — these are momentous times, indeed. But ones the founders left us well-equipped to address. Thank you, Messrs. Hamilton and Jefferson — and countless others. . . .

UPDATED @ 3:10 PM EST: The administration has already filed papers in at least three federal courts on both coasts, arguing that those courts should let the New Muslim Ban go into effect on March 16, 2017, thus: “…Rather, the Order applies only to those who are overseas and without a visa. That grouping presents the highest concern with respect to the adequacy of visa screening procedures, circumstances for which the courts afford “considerable deference to the President’s policy determinations.” Washington, 847 F.3d at 1164. Nor is there any immediate harm presented to that grouping. They do not have visas and do not have an entitlement to one. Indeed, even if there were some legal right, there is no imminent harm from a temporary suspension where visa applicants normally must wait a period of months or longer to apply and/or be issued a visa or travel document if found eligible. See Declaration of Emily Chiang ¶ 13 (ECF No. 8) (“The process of getting a visa for her mother who lives in Iran was long and arduous. It took six months to get an appointment with the embassy. Her appointment was in August and she finally received her visa in early January.”)….”

The portion I bolded, above — completely mischaracterizes the existing federal law. The Trump administration cannot change the law, simply by making a false assertion about it. The New Muslim Ban will be a dead letter. [The administration’s ED NY version of the filing (in 17-cv-0480) of this afternoon, may be found here.]

Later update: a very well-respected and very conservative legal scholar, says “Ban 2.0” is a dead letter — for certain. Professor Somin makes the argument in a more fullsome, adroit and thoughtful fashion, than I might ever hope to muster. But his thesis is mine as well.

So, do go read it all — if you want to know how this will all end. Here endeth my sermon, for this day.

नमस्ते

In Which 45 Tweets An Old Public Photo…

untitledUPDATED: As of Saturday night, finally at least one of the PowerLiners has figured it all out: Trump went truly daft today (like “shouldn’t be the leader of the free world” daft), suggesting that a duly-obtained FISA court warrant, issued by a federal court judge, meant that 44 was “wire-tapping” him personally. Sheesh.

It is obvious to anyone with a working fore brain (and knowledge of Trump’s off-the-wall, almost always ineffectual jujitsu), that 45 made this utterly stupid assertion to deflect from what is likely to be a very damning series of disclosures — about Russian influences — in the coming days or weeks. And finally, now one PowerLiner figured that out:

“…one could also surmise that [45] sees new trouble ahead and wants to change, as best he can, the focus of the conversation….” Indeed. Welcome to… reality, Paul. [End, updated portion.]

This is all rather… elementary — is it not? [I won’t wait for Mr. Hinderaker’s dissembling white-wash of it all, this time….]

We all know, after Junior High — that what is done in the light of day (“eating donuts!”) with a Russian Premier is not a problem — in a free and fair democracy. It is transparency we require. Like this photo, Mr. Trump. [And like the one of Rep. Pelosi. These were public photo ops — in the broad light of day. Idiot.]

Whopperline-Bryan-1910-Trump-2016Mr. Trump seems incapable of grasping that what he or his surrogates from his campaign and transition team did, or might have done — under cover of SECRECY… is a very very serious issue.

Mr. Trump needs a truly independent counsel to investigate the whole affair, since it is plain that either (1) his own people are lying repeatedly to him — about these secret Russian meetings, or (2) he himself has been supporting/coordinating the dissembling about the same. It no longer matters what was said. He has personally helped push a lie to the American people, and in some cases, under oath, before Congress.

That latter No. (2) would clearly be a potentially impeachable, treasonous offense. And No. (1) is damning evidence of a nearly genetic inability to govern — but I repeat myself.

So, while my graphic has a light-hearted satirical cast to it — this is now a very serious Constitutional matter. One that the two other branches should independently investigate.

What has 45 and his surrogate team promised the Russians? And to whom does he owe money?

His missing IRS tax returns make it impossible to know — and his ever changing story (even on this narrow topic!) makes it impossible to believe his word.

As Powerliners Spin It As An Effort To “Undetermine” [Sic] 45…

whopperline-geo-washington-quote-intel-2017Mr. Johnson at Powerline says this is all just an effort to “undetermine” [sic] Mr. Trump. Hilarious — he can’t even proofread. I assume he means undermine. But whatever. [UPDATE: He fixed the obvious typo there.]

Crickets so far, from Mr. Hinderaker. No shock there.

Per the Washington Post, this morning:

…In written questions, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Sessions, “Will you commit that, if you are confirmed as Attorney General, you will recuse yourself from any investigation into whether President-elect Trump or any of his family, campaign staff, business associates or advisors had any communication with Russian officials or operatives during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, or had any connection to, knowledge of, or involvement in Russian efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election?”

Sessions responded, “I am not aware of a basis to recuse myself from such investigations. However, if a specific matter arose where I believed my impartiality might reasonably be questioned, I would consult with Department ethics officials regarding the most appropriate way to proceed. As I made clear at my confirmation hearing, I will always be fair and work within the law and the established procedures of the Department.” How he could not see that his own communications would be at issue is puzzling…. [Ed.: Puzzling, indeed.]

untitled…Others were more heated in their assessments. Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (Md.), ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, put out a written statement, declaring, “It is inconceivable that even after Michael Flynn was fired for concealing his conversations with the Russians that Attorney General Sessions would keep his own conversations secret for several more weeks.” Cummings said Sessions’s statement denying contact “was demonstrably false, yet he let it stand for weeks — and he continued to let it stand even as he watched the President tell the entire nation he didn’t know anything about anyone advising his campaign talking to the Russians.” He concluded, “Attorney General Sessions should resign immediately, and there is no longer any question that we need a truly independent commission to investigate this issue….”

Jeff Sessions has lied to Congress — and about Russian conversations that no one else on his Committee (that’s his cover story, at least) was privy to. He should resign. Period.

Ahem. The Term “Serious President” Is Self-Mocking, As Applied To 45.

whopper-3trump-not-serious-2017This scarcely bears much mention — so I’ll make the post short-form — but the idea of the graphic felt far too fun to pass up.

Friday morning, Mr. Hinderaker felt the need to describe a sitting President of the most powerful nation on  Earth as… “a serious President“.

I laughed out loud. [UPDATE: By Sunday morning, he had edited that concluding line out of his copy — but it was there for almost three days.]

The idea that anyone would have to defend that office-holder from an operating assumption that he is indeed, not a serious person — in a serious role — is completely self-deflating.

Just as I wrote weeks ago now, most of the defenses of Mr. Trump have become laughable — on their face — because they seek (so vainly) to normalize the incomprehensible babble he speaks. And when he is clear, he is openly lying 90 per cent of the time.

So I’ll just chuckle. And say “nice ‘do, man…” Really — nice new… ‘do.

 

Oh, The Nonsense 45 Tweets!

trump-tweets-lack-basic-understandings-2017Apparently, Mr. Trump thinks that an organized (and in some cases, angry) gathering, of one’s constituents is… “Sad!”

We might thus infer that he believes candidate rules (the right to script out meetings, and control crowds — loading them only with true believers — via advance ticket registrations) apply to those who now govern. Not so. Now the full on first amendment applies, Mr. Trump.

Alternatively, we might infer that he thinks Republican Congressmen need only “serve the Republicans”, in their districts.

High School Civics (US version) primer  — for Herr Trump: under our system of government, once elected, they (and you) represent everyone in the district/nation — not just the people who voted for you. You are duty bound to listen to the dissenters as well. It doesn’t matter whether they are organized, or spontaneous — you serve them. You must listen to them.

Here is the latest Tweet, from the Ignoramus-in-Chief:

Donald J. Trump — 4 hrs ago…

…The so-called angry crowds in home districts of some Republicans are actually, in numerous cases, planned out by liberal activists. Sad!….

Oh. Eee-gads. The horrors. At some point in his tour as President, Mr. Trump may likewise be hectored by people who did not vote for him — live and in person. But he owes them his ear — as he serves them too.

Not the other way ’round. It often seems that he thinks we the people are here to serve him (as he has now spent — in one MONTH, in taxpayer-funded protection and logistics, on trips/travel… fully one-tenth of what Mr. Obama spent, in eight years).

A “Real Scandal”? No Mr. Hinderaker — That’s… Just Libel.

untitledTonight — in his continuing “alternative reality” (i.e., no facts) approach to deflecting 45’s unfolding Russian communications scandal at the White House — Mr. Hinderaker decides to conjure up a false (previously well-debunked) nothing burger, from 2008 — about Mr. Obama, during the waning days of his first campaign for the Oval Office.

Of course, since Mr. Hinderaker once vomited largely incoherently on his blog about it — it must be true (in his mind). So, we are told by him that today’s events are not a real scandal — but the debunked claim that Mr. Obama secretly communicated with “some Mullahs,” in Iran (not the government), and mythically undercut 43’s bargaining position, is a real scandal.

No. John. Just… no.

You simply traffic in libel, tonight.

John’s fifth third hand hearsay “source” (note: single source) heard it from a guy who heard it from a guy, who heard it from a guy who… was apparently a Gerald Ford (R) era attaché in that part of the world — before the Shah fell. We are talking 1977 or earlier — and he’s the sole source — for a rumor about 2008 BHO 44?! Seriously?!

Unimpressive.

whopperlie-hinderaker-2017Now Mr. Trump’s ACTUAL (if still unfolding) scandal — the Russians have confirmed they intended to aid Trump’s election. Trump said on TV he wanted them to get into HRC’s email for him. Parts of the 35 page dossier’s communications data has been confirmed through intercepts of Russian agents by our own US intel community.

In fact, we now know the Russians did hack/steal the DNC’s emails. In fact, the consensus view of the NSA, CIA and FBI continues to be that MULTIPLE Trump ’16 campaign staffers and now high ranking White House people have had ongoing pre- and post-election conversations with the Russians (some or most of whom may well turn out to be spies). [The pre-Inaugural ones would be felonies — under the Logan Act; the post Inaugural ones should be screened for emolument clause violations.]

whpopperline-trump-charity-wa-po-09-20-16Moreover, because we cannot see his tax returns, we cannot be certain, but the bits we’ve seen suggest various parts of 45’s business empire owe money — perhaps into the high hundreds of millions of dollars — to Russian state-affiliated banks and other Russian lenders… So, it is absolutely within our rights — as a people, to demand to know what White House favors he is trading — in return for those continuing loans and assorted foreign emoluments.

This is a scandal that may well make Watergate look like a small order of fries…

But instead of addressing the facts already known in 2017 — Mr. Hinderaker choses to libel a now-private citizen (BHO 44) about fictional events from 2008 — that in no way undermine the charges leveled against the Trump White House by responsible journalists, nation-wide.

Charming.

 

 

National Security Advisor Lies To VPOTUS — About Felony (Logan Act Violating) Russian Conversations; And POTUS Says The “Story” Is…

trumpequalsperon… the “illegal leaks” of these facts: including the FACT that 45’s head of National Security is a liar, and a blackmail risk — due to his Russian shenanigans?!

Here is 45’s tweet of this morning:

“…Donald J. Trump  4 hours ago:

The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?…”

Ahem. I guess Mr. Trump doesn’t believe the people have a right to know what his chosen representatives have done — in his name — that breaks the law. I guess he believes that committing felonies on the job cannot be the subject of a free press inquiry.

What was Watergate? Or Iran Contra? Or Abu Ghraib? Or… Mei Lai? Oh. Right. In 45’s veiw, those were deplorable leaks by intel, not crimes against the people by their own executive branch — ostensibly in the name of these same people. C’mon man — get a grip. You just got busted.

Confidential to Mr. Trump: if you want to stop the leaks — by patriots who believe in our system of checks and balances — who believe in ordered liberty, rather than monarchy…

Tell your people to stop violating the law, and lying about it to your own VP.

That would be a very sensible start.

Mr. Trump, Mr. Flynn’s implosion is exactly what you deserve — you chose him, even though all the reliable the vetting suggested he’d be a liability.

It’s only a matter of time before Mr. Bannon and Mr. Miller similarly implode. I should note for a complete record that the PowerLine ditto-heads are repeating this garbage — even though they told us that Dan Rather’s arguable prevaricating (a nightly news anchor, over a decade ago) was a national crisis — during electioneering about Bush 43.

Here the Trump Administration’s chief of national security was clearly lying to the VPOTUS. About a felony. And that’s a nothing burger at PowerLine. Sheesh.

 

 

 

Short Form: Mr. Hinderaker “Assumes Away” The Central Issue, In Muslim Ban Cases…

life-brooklyn-no-ban-stay-2017I’ve promised myself that I’ll not spend too many electrons — on John Hinderaker’s duplicitous nonsense –any longer.

But “some things need sayin’” — now that he purports to “assume away” the central issue presented by Mr. Trump’s Muslim Banning executive order.

So let’s just say that the Supremes will, under long-standing precedents, take notice of Mr. Trump’s bigoted animus — as reflected in many many public written and video-taped statements — when the highest Court finally takes up the issue of the ban.

John is correct tonight, insofar as he recites the statutory basis for a general presidential order, related to immigration to the US. But the President cannot act where Congress has forbidden his actions — nor can he act where the founders, by Constitutional drafting have long ago forbidden his acting. Silly — he simply ignores the issue — and cites a single section of a single statute, ignoring all its subsequent amendments (inside the same federal statute) — and the larger overarching Constitutional provisions.

whopperline-01-28-17So, in sum, Mr. Hinderaker simply ignores the veritable cornucopia of evidence that THIS President has extra-Constitutional ends in mind, with his order. [It is more of an… orgy of evidence, actually.] See these evidentiary declarations, from the State of Washington, alone. They are attached as exhibits to the brief of last week.

Mark my words, the Supremes will strike his Muslim Ban.

No one may claim any Executive power that violates our Constitution, nor its first ten amendments. Trust that.

See ya’, John. And thank you, Messrs. Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison and Washington.

On A Sunday Morning, Mr. Hinderaker Concedes: “It was all political theater…”

whopperline-trump-immiration-2017I suppose we should regard this as progress, after a fashion.

Mr. Hinderaker today essentially concedes that Mr. Trump’s executive order on immigration is… ultimately impotent. DOA, in fact.

The path he takes to arrive at this conclusion is not in any way surprising, and error riddled, but it is (for me) only the conclusion that matters:

Mr. Trump needs Congress to completely overhaul immigration laws in the US if we are to really be any safer. That is Mr. Hinderaker’s conclusion.

Of course, as John well knows, it is in fact the grown descendants of very few immigrants who pose the threat — such as he perceives it, anyway. So he all but admits there is no way to “vet” the infant children already here. Especially so, where only perhaps one one-thousandth of one per cent of them will ever turn out to be anything other than solid citizens. Same with infants whose families have been here since our earliest days.

He knows it, too. He just leaves that part unsaid.

In short, he concedes that immigration policy cannot make us safer.

And in the process, he rather meekly chides Mr. Trump for this clearly un-American attempt — though he won’t even call it that.

But he does know it is DOA — the federal courts will now dutifully eviscerate it as unlawful over-reach.

This is how the founders set our democracy in motion, over 220 years ago — with explicit checks embedded, against tyrants — yep, built right in, in fact. They had suffered atrocities under the rule of vain and small men like him. So they designed the whole of the then radical form of self-government around… blunting the would-be moves of men… like him.

Thanks, Mr. Hamilton. Truly. Thanks!

 

Mr. Trump’s Immigration Order Is Patently… Unlawful

whopperline-01-28-17UPDATED @ 10 PM CST: I told you so. Two The able federal judges have stayed the executive order. Expect a WHOLE LOT more of this, in the coming weeks — on all his orders.

[End, updated portion.]

The ditto-heads at PowerLine Blog are openly admitting that it is… largely incomprehensible.

But they are cheering it, just the same.

It is also… clearly beyond Mr. Trump’s powers. The President may not repeal, by executive order, protections granted by law through prior Congressional action. That is simple black  letter law, established over 150-plus years.

His latest order was supposedly mostly authored by Mr. Bannon — and it is a drafting mess. Scant surprise, there.

But it is clear that the intent of it is to ban (or extremely vet) people from certain countries — in short, based on nation of  origin.

The Hart-Celler amendments (of 1965) to the Immigration Act specifically outlaw that whole idea.

The ACLU has already sued, in federal court in New York. Soon the District Court judge there will enjoin its operation. A President alone cannot undo what the Congress has affirmatively done, in this arena.

In 1965, Congress passed, and President Johnson signed (in shadow of the Statue of Liberty), a change in law. [It outlawed the former quotas by country practice, under a 1952 immigration amendment, based on a 1921 Act.] The 1965 amendments ended discrimination against immigrants — based on national origin.

“….The Hart-Celler Act of 1965:

Established the basic structure of today’s immigration law.

Abolished the national origins quota system (originally established in 1921 and most recently modified in 1952), while attempting to keep immigration to a manageable level. Family reunification became the cornerstone of U.S. immigration policy….

The preference system for visa admissions detailed in the law (modified in 1990) was as follows:

Unmarried adult sons and daughters of U.S. citizens.

Spouses and children and unmarried sons and daughters of permanent resident aliens.

Members of the professions and scientists and artists of exceptional ability.

Married children of U.S. citizens.

Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens over age twenty-one.

Skilled and unskilled workers in occupations for which there is insufficient labor supply.

Refugees given conditional entry or adjustment — chiefly people from Communist countries and the Middle East.

Applicants not entitled to preceding preferences — i.e., everyone else….”

 

Now you know. And the above means Mr. Trump cannot give Christians (residing in these countries) the priority he pretends to confer — not without an Act of Congress, at least.

Mr. Trump has once again wasted our taxpayer funds on a vain, ultimately impotent and poorly thought out overreach.