Today Musk Discloses That The “Margin Loans” Are Terminated. He Is Looking For Other Ways To Do The Twitter Deal, Formally Now…

Not a surprise. After Tesla stock nosedived, his prior margin-call commitments were set to become quite onerous. In fact, the Twitter deal has been widely seen as dragging down Tesla’s stock, since the two were stapled at the hip by his foolish margin loan structure.

So this evening, he discloses that the margin commitment is no more, and he is working on other ways to satisfy his purchaser obligations.

To be fair, while this can be read as good news for long suffering Tesla shareholders… it also makes it increasingly easy to pay his $1 billion kill-fee and walk away. He may do so, by simply saying he did not find acceptable other means of financing the offer he’s made.

We shall see — but with Twitter trading at around $37/share today, the market plainly now has a view that it is 60-40 against, on probabilities of a deal closing.

You heard it here, first.

Out, grinning. What a feckless tool this guy has turned out to be.

Candace Owens Is… Just Salty, Since She And Melania Have Never Been Cover-Grrls, For Cosmo…

This morning — in a series of three completely insane tweets, Candace Owens lays blame for the 18 year old, whyte mass-shooter in Texas (who bought two AR-15s on his eighteenth birthday, without any supervision — or a background check)… a guy who murdered 18 unarmed elementary school-kids, and their teacher, in their classroom… wounding at least ten others, forcing them to watch their friends die horribly, before their eyes (and this was only an hour or so after he shot his own grandmother, in the face, in her home)…

And yet, Candace tells us it is body positivity and inclusion that is the root cause of his rampage.

Wow.

I won’t link her insanity, you may find it easily on Twitter. Search her name.

She even put up pictures to show us what she means by the US’s collective mental illness. She put up this cover — which I’ve helpfully edited. I will not let her libel the actual brilliantly smart, beautifully strong, and healthy woman of color — on the original Cosmo cover.

Nah — I think it all comes down to (as we saw last week with Melania!)… the sheer jealousy — of a Jezabel.

She is just… salty, that she’ll never make the cover of Cosmo — nor will Melania. [Archived graphic at left, since this is a pattern of libel of Candace’s: she libeled KBJ about issues related to KBJ’s positions on gender, and Roe.]

Candace — sit down and shut up.

New Allegations Of Union Busting In Newest Amazon NY Distribution Center

I will post this one here, to keep a complete record, but I’m not sure what to make of all that voluntary job switching, inside Amazon, four times in under two years, while relocating twice in cross country moves. It could show a deep commitment to the company, or it could be a sign of a supposed problem being repeatedly shipped around to other facilities. So, I am not clear whether it will be particularly helpful to establishing the couple’s credibility, as witnesses.

In any event this is to keep a record, as I say:

. . .Main said he was suspended a few days after telling two human resources managers and an operations manager that he might try to organize a union at the warehouse.

His partner, Ashley Mercer, alleged in her own complaint to the NLRB that, on the same day Main was suspended, the company ordered her to spend a day in the sun picking up cigarette butts in the parking lot even though she is six months pregnant. She said she was given no water or suntan lotion and suffered sunburn on her face and arms. . . .

The couple said they moved in October from Brooklyn to Syracuse to take advantage of Central New York’s cheaper cost of living. Despite knowing of their union support, Amazon approved their request for a transfer from Staten Island to its last-mile delivery center in DeWitt, they said.

They said they did not come to Syracuse to organize a union drive but were upfront about their support for a union. They wore Amazon Labor Union T-shirts and face masks at work in DeWitt and frequently talked to other workers about their support for the union and the possibility of organizing workers at the facility, the couple said.

Mercer said she suffered a rotator cuff injury from lifting products at the delivery center and was out of work for a month while receiving workers’ compensation benefits. When the highly automated Clay warehouse opened at the start of May, she said, she and Main asked Amazon to transfer them there, hoping the pace of work would be slower. . . .

The Clay warehouse is the fourth Amazon warehouse where Main and Mercer have worked. They worked in Chicago in 2020 before transferring to the Amazon warehouse known as JFK8 on Staten Island in 2021. . . .

Now you know. . . in partially hidden mode, since last evening. . . for safety’s sake.

नमस्ते

Hello John — We’ve Met. I AM One Of The 21% You Don’t Believe… Exist.

We were known to each other, professionally [the rest is redacted] chucklehead.

I am one of the 21% who has great confidence in Mr. Biden’s, and his team’s abilities to manage our role in helping thwart Putin’s attacks in Ukraine. I am 110% confident already — that he has shown his approach is vastly preferable to the one we would have seen with your boy, 45.

45 was busily giving huge chunks of other sovereign nations’ lands away to Putin — for a cash price, that benefitted the Trump family personally. That was his whole end game — build his real estate empire.

So — yes John, I am sure you don’t get out much. Certainly not in the real, working, competent world. The world not driven by crony capitalism and nepotism.

The other 95% of us — who actually earn our livings — we see competent, nuanced leadership from 1600 Penn, right now.

Not the former tangerine insult machine, that is for certain.

Sit down — again.

Retiring Justice Breyer Asks, In A Dissent — “How Long Awaiting Death, In Solitary Confinement Would Violate The Eighth Amendment?” How About… FOUR DECADES?!

I am certain Hinderaker thinks nothing of his crap post of last evening. Certain of it.

And, now as Justice Breyer prepares to leave the highest court, he perhaps tilted at a formidable windmill this morning, as no other Justice signed on to his opinion in Smith v. Shinn. Maybe so. But. He. Is. Not. Wrong.

These various US courts have a fascination with barbarians’ power — of putting men to death. He will die alone — just as he has lived, alone. Effectively, with the noose ever present, around his neck — for 44 years.

Yes, Smith absolutely committed the underlying murder. But in the 44 years he’s been on death row, he twice saw the upper courts vacate his death sentence, saying the process was flawed — once in 1999; and once in 2007. But for essentially all of those four decades plus, Arizona has kept him in solitary — alone, in a concrete box the size of a single car parking space. Prior precedents hold four weeks is too long to live alone, on / under a pending death order. Here is his attempt to topple the windmill:

…We have said that the uncertainty of waiting in prison under threat of execution for just four weeks is “one of the most horrible feelings to which [a person] can be subjected.” In re Medley, 134 U. S. 160, 172 (1890). On top of that, “[y]ears on end of near-total isolation exact a terrible price.” Davis v. Ayala, 576 U. S. 257, 289 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring).

Smith has been subjected to those conditions, not for four weeks, but for four decades. While I recognize, as I did in 2017, that procedural obstacles make it difficult for us to grant certiorari here, I continue to believe that the excessive length of time that Smith and others have spent on death row awaiting execution raises serious doubts about the constitutionality of the death penalty as it is currently administered. See Glossip v. Gross, 576 U. S. 863, 908 (2015) (dissenting opinion); see also, e.g., Buntion v. Lumpkin, 596 U. S. ___ (2022) (statement respecting denial of application for stay); Hamm v. Dunn, 583 U. S. ___ (2018) (statement respecting denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari)….

We are a nation of savages. Yes, he absolutely is guilty. And he certainly — even guilty — was entitled not to be tortured for four decades, if we were not… a nation of savages. But there can be little argument tonight, that with eight “justices” saying kill him anyway, and 14 school children dead by an automatic weapon-weilding 18 year old US citizen / whyte kid — in rural Texas… we are… truly becoming savages. Out — I’m… out.

नमस्ते

Hinderaker Cannot Help Himself: Offers A Chart That Proves Tangerine Had The Highest Mortality Four Years… EVER!

And surprisingly, I am not just referring to the 800,000 or so COVID-19 deaths on his watch.

No, tonight Hinderaker wants to crow (disgustingly) that mass shootings are “up”, under Mr. Biden.

Hilariously (in lying by graphics!), he even puts up a chart or two. I’ve modified one, at lower left. What a stupid, stupid… tool.

He proves my point, first made in late 2017, that Trump was the “killing-est” President — ever.

Thanks John — of geese and gander, then.

When one sums mass shooting incident deaths, with the deaths from Covid-19 on Trump’s watch… there is no doubt that — except for total Allied deaths under FDR and WW II (even Lincoln, when we were killing one another, was only 600,000), no one President has ever seen so many Americans put to death by his decisions — though in Tangerine’s case all of these were due to “failures” — failures to act quickly on Covid, and failure to address streets awash in AR-15 style assault weapons.

Cheers, chucklehead.

Surprising No Real Student Of Con Law, DeSantis’ Stupid “Anti-Deplatforming” Law Is DOA: Eleventh Circuit

In no manner a novel holding, as the federal trial-level court in Miami came to exactly the same conclusion, we read this evening that Hinderaker cannot understand actual First Amendment law, as written over the past half century at least.

And DeSantis’ goose-steppers have been told to pack it in. [This would suggest that he slept through most of his Yale undergrad classes, as well. Too much partying as a frat boy, and legacy admitted baseball player, I gather.]

This purported act he signed is… is no law, at all. And the Supremes will agree, if the moron DeSantis decides to waste his time and appeal.

Florida and Texas are now clearly two places I’d never live in, and perhaps never willingly visit again now. Not under these anti-freedom governors, and their GOP controlled legislatures. Here’s the latest, from the fine 67 page opinion:

…The question at the core of this appeal is whether the Facebooks and Twitters of the world — indisputably “private actors” with First Amendment rights — are engaged in constitutionally protected expressive activity when they moderate and curate the content that they disseminate on their platforms. The State of Florida insists that they aren’t, and it has enacted a first-of-its-kind law to combat what some of its proponents perceive to be a concerted effort by “the ‘big tech’ oligarchs in Silicon Valley” to “silenc[e]” “conservative” speech in favor of a “radical leftist” agenda. To that end, the new law would, among other things, prohibit certain social-media companies from “deplatforming” political candidates under any circumstances, prioritizing or deprioritizing any post or message “by or about” a candidate, and, more broadly, removing anything posted by a “journalistic enterprise” based on its content….

We hold that it is substantially likely that social-media companies — even the biggest ones are “private actors” whose rights the First Amendment protects, Manhattan Cmty., 139 S. Ct. at 1926, that their so-called “content-moderation” decisions constitute protected exercises of editorial judgment, and that the provisions of the new Florida law that restrict large platforms’ ability to engage in content moderation unconstitutionally burden that prerogative. We further conclude that it is substantially likely that one of the law’s particularly onerous disclosure provisions — which would require covered platforms to provide a “thorough rationale” for each and every content-moderation decision they make — violates the First Amendment. Accordingly, we hold that the companies are entitled to a preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of those provisions….

S.B. 7072 triggers First Amendment scrutiny because it restricts social-media platforms’ exercise of editorial judgment and requires them to make certain disclosures; (2) strict scrutiny applies to some of the Act’s content-moderation restrictions while intermediate scrutiny applies to others; (3) the Act’s disclosure provisions should be assessed under the standard articulated in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985); (4) it is substantially likely that the Act’s content-moderation restrictions will not survive even intermediate scrutiny….

Grinning ear to ear, here now. Onward — put that in your pipe and smoke it, Ronnie… and Johnny.

नमस्ते

WSJ, Scott And John: Another Novelle “Three Stooges” Act?

Scott Johnson belatedly adds his voice to suggest that he and the WSJ regard the Sussmann trial evidence as some watershed moment in US political history.

Maybe, boys — but… just not in the way he and they imagine….

As we previously showed (via the absolutely spot on, cogent and irrepressible EmptyWheel transcript efforts), Team Durham has — in direct violation of not one, but TWO of USDC Judge Cooper’s explicit orders, introduced emails and texts that were to be redacted for prejudicial, non-probative invective.

But that Durham team of lawyers had a witness read them into the record — thus this frothy far right maelstrom of outrage, against HRC. But what these whyte boyz miss… is that it implicates Tangerine, even more so, since it was part of a prior investigation of Alfa Bank, and the Tangerine campaign’s use of it for… yep — money laundering, and illicit undisclosed Russian contributions (mostly in kind).

So — while neither HRC or Trump are on trial in the Sussmann matter, each time these folks (Hinderaker, Hayward, Johnson, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Reynolds and now WSJ op editors) amplify this misleading-at-best narrative, they collectively increase the odds that a mistrial is declared, or Durham flames out entirely on appeal, for violating two direct court orders, in presenting “evidence” ruled out of bounds.

So — the watershed moment (or “Watergate” one, if you like!) is now likely to be the complete collapse of the prosecution… if even one juror says they saw the WSJ this past Sunday.

How very droll.

Some Community Resistance To Testing; Now Five Cases; Four Deaths In DRC

We cannot be certain, since the two were from the same extended family / local group, and the younger daughter died before being tested. So it is either three or four.

But it is logical to infer that both these children died of Ebola, since the older child was diagnosed, and then the family refused treatment, taking him back home. Here is the latest:

. . .Sources add that another 9-year-old child died with the same symptoms, in the same neighborhood, on May 6 and buried, without post-mortem collection or a dignified and secure burial. This raises fears of a multiplication of cases.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo is experiencing its fourteenth Ebola outbreaks since 1976. The current outbreak is the sixth since 2018 alone – the most frequent occurrence in the country’s Ebola history. Previous outbreaks in Equateur Province were in 2020 and 2018, with 130 and 54 recorded cases respectively. . . .

This certainly highlights the daunting task of educating the public about the risks of ignoring symptoms. Very disconcerting.

नमस्ते

Hinderaker: Looks Like A… Mistrial, To Me…

I’ve just been made aware, by the excellent EW, that USDC Judge Cooper, in the Sussmann trial, had specifically forbidden the Durham team from reading the HRC material Hinderaker crowed about, last night. [Hinderaker chirped “Guilty, Guilty… Guilty!” or some such.]

The ruling saying it was both hearsay, and unduly prejudicial (not probabtive)… was not ten minutes before Team Durham had a witness read the whole thing into the record, unredacted.

And Judge Cooper had, a few weeks earlier, entered a formal written order excluding it.

The idea here… is that it was… intentional by Team Durham, and clearly prejudicial, since the jury is not sequestered — and thus may well be grounds for a mistrial. It in fact establishes that, for good reason, Trump’s campaign ties to Alfa Bank were being investigated by law enforcement — for corruption BY TRUMP. Not not not HRC.

[Of course, neither HRC or Trump is on trial here. But Durham just put Trump’s role in the Russian influence on 2016 directly into evidence — intending to smear Sussmann by association — but likely imploding his own case, by violating two specific orders of the judge trying the case.]

Good work, Johnny! — “Doin’ a heckuva’ job, Brownie!” You frothy far right idiots have undone whatever it was that Durham thought he had (likely illicitly) achieved, here.

H I L A R I O U S.

Say goodnight to your would-be “Watergate by analogy” wet-dreams.