Tonight John plugs his daughter’s political organization — and begs his followers for donations to it.
I see that as small-minded and provincial thinking, on his part — but well within John’s usual chicanery, using his readership, for personal / family financial gain.
This — at the end of the above linked solicitation post — made me smile. If you know me, you will know why (as he went on a vacuous tangent):
“…Turning Point is an aggressive, fun, principled, pro-free market organization that was founded by Charlie Kirk and received a huge boost from the contributions of Candace Owens, whom I wrote about here. Later this month, I will attend a portion of TPUSA’s Young Black Leadership Summit at the White House. I know, I am neither young nor black, but managed to wangle an invitation anyway….”
So… a doughy, late 60-ish, stiff, old white protestant will hang with the only three existing “leaders” of the young black conservative movement, at Trump’s White House, soon? [To be abundantly clear here, real conservatives — black or white — do not endorse Trump. Or his policies of big government graft, and corruption / nepotism for personal gain.
Moreover, he is truly a socialist — look at his farm payoffs, to offset his tariffs nonsense.]
That’s… precious, John. Just precious. Party on man.
UPDATED: Monday 09.24.18 Evening: Now that Kavanaugh and his wife appeared on Fox News, tonight — John’s 
And… about the encounter with the Parkland father (that one is on videotape)? [BTW, since you wrote yours, Mr. Avenatti now alleges Kavanaugh and Judge organized booze- and drug- induced attempted and completed gang sexual assaults, on various women, in bathrooms — at “parties“… and this is separate from his exposing himself at a party to a Yale woman.]
…And I, for one, believe her. [John’s 
John, for his part, is “okay” with what would have been a US Supreme Court Justice who — even as a high schooler — highly likely might have forcibly sexually assaulted a woman who is now a Stanford professor.
Not a peep from John and the boys — on the clearly unprecedented (even if one styles it solely, and in a very pallid way) simple disloyalty. After all, in the eyes of 45 — he tweeted “TREASON?” about the author of the NYT opinion, tonight)….
As of this moment, you are still an enabler — and ultimately, a coward — for trying to have it both ways. Want your name and reputation back? Move in public, before the full cabinet, for a vote on the 25th Amendment proceedings.
This is going to be a series, I think; a theme: John picks a target — a 
…Meanwhile, kidnapped brown children are STILL being kept in cages, in violation of our laws.
And the point of the movie — not that I even care — is (apparently) that the moon’s conquest was the achievement of ALL humanity, all scientists, not just one nation’s.
…But he 
He 
Putting aside John’s preposterously bad reading of the jury’s tea leaves, for a moment (and his treating Presidential felonies as simple popularity questions): that is simply… insane, John — even for you. It is a question of law — not of politics. It is a crime, by the sitting President — not some popularity question.
I’m not sure whether John is showing his first, but clear, signs of early onset dementia — or whether he’s really this… cluelessly feckless. [It seems unfathomable that he actually believes his tripe.]
I’ll not spend much time dissecting or repeating 
