Author: condor

Most Savvy Analysts Believe Some US Controlled Entity, Or Group Of High Net Worth Individuals, Will Get Control Of TikTok US…

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

This is a minor update, to our coverage of last week.

It is clear that Apple (and its market leading App Store) will NOT return the TikTok download to the App Store’s shelves until this is sorted out. It has formally said it is simply following the law the Supremes upheld last week. And we are beyond the grace period for a divestiture of the US operations that the Congress thoughtfully-baked-into the law, proper.

Perhaps the most surprising part of this delay is that (if MSM reports are to be believed) China’s Xi is now open to letting US investor(s) gain control of the US operations of TikTok. That, coupled to the likelihood that ByteDance has been talking to various suitors for months now. . . should signal a quick deal closing.

But I suppose with Tangerine 2.0 now muddying the waters — by saying maybe the US government must get a 50% stake in the US operations (a proposal with manifold Constitutional infirmities) — the calmer, more rational businesspeople at the negotiating table are seeking ways to blunt the orange tinged chaos (should they announce an M&A deal that doesn’t make the US government at least a part owner).

In any event, Condor thinks the proper lens on all of this is that it will take longer… precisely BECAUSE Trump infuses chaos everywhere he drops in. In time, though — the private parties’ deal (Amazon? Oracle? or another) will get done. [As we said before, Musk hisself has Hart-Scott problems here. since he personally controls X-itter (formerly Twitter, a competitor).] Here’s some representative coverage in the MSM:

…[T]he big question is now about who or what will buy TikTok and not whether ByteDance will sell it, some experts say. Still, it will be complicated. People have also expressed concerns over how a sale might affect TikTok’s unique algorithm, which is known for its ability to curate highly personalized feeds and may be hard to replicate by a new owner.

“What happens to the algorithm? Will this be an outright sale or a JV/partnership structure?” Dan Ives, an analyst for the financial services firm Wedbush Securities, wrote in an analyst note Wednesday. “Our view is ByteDance is willing to play ball and look for a legitimate deal/JV partner to keep TikTok up and running while protecting its algorithm. From the beginning we have only seen a few core potential bidders for the TikTok asset that would be ‘approved’ by Beijing…”

Trump has proposed the idea of a joint venture that produces a 50-50 ownership split between ByteDance and the United States, although it’s unclear whether he means ownership by the U.S. government [Ed. Note: Seriously, WTH, Tangerine?!] or a U.S. company….

As I’ve said before, I don’t use the stuff — but I am a balanced supporter of both… free expression privileges — and our own US national security concerns. We will keep an eye on it — so, do stay tuned. Onward, into a chilly, but sunny Friday here… with bright white stuff covering most open ground, still. [I’ll do a Lilly-focused Q4 2024 lobby piece next, based on high traffic out of Lilly’s HQ down in Indy. Grin….]

नमस्ते

As I Pointed Out To John Hinderaker, Last Night — That Argument Was D.O.A. — Idiotic, In Fact.

~ condor ~ 1 Comment

Or, “That Was… Swift. “The 14th Amendment Means Just What It Says”. Tangerine 2.0 Cannot Repeal It, With A Sharpie…”

These guys — geez — they are… preposterous.

Arguing that people without papers “are not subject” to US jurisdiction… is patently… silly. And self-defeating for these idiots. So the executive order is dead — before the Sharpie’s ink even had a chance to fully-dry.

Here’s the completely unsurprising account, from the AP:

…A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order redefining birthright citizenship, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional” during the first hearing in a multi-state effort challenging the order.

“This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” USDC Judge Coughenour (a Ronald Reagan appointee) told Shumate. The judge said he’s been on the bench for more than four decades, and he couldn’t remember seeing another case where the action challenged so clearly violated the constitution.

[Tangerine attorney] Brett Shumate said he… disagreed and asked the judge for an opportunity to have a full briefing on the merits of the case, rather than have a 14-day restraining order issued blocking its implementation.

Arguing for the states, Washington assistant attorney general Lane Polozola labeled as “absurd” the government’s argument that the children of parents living in the country illegally are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States….

Yep. Just as I said — when I gave you some “Lion King” to smile over. Here’s some more:

नमस्ते

Full Year ’24 Results: Amgen Lobby Spending; Year Over Year Trends, Against Three Other Majors…

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

We have covered both Merck and Pfizer, in the Q4 ’24 lobby spends, of each — do see below, yesterday. Now it is time to look at the run-away full year 2024 leader: Amgen. This year’s spending was truly outsized — for the Thousand Oaks company — and doubly so — for an election year.

In any event, here is the (very hefty!) list of what all the bioscience major, Amgen spent on — just looking at Q4 ’24. But as I’ve said, I would expect Pfizer to once again be the overall spend leader in the full year 2025 — if for no other reason than that it is about double the size of most of the others, on market cap and global revenue:

…▲ Issues related to drug pricing reform; Changes to Public law 117-1769 Inflation Reduction Act; Awareness of implications to patients and research and development of Public law 117-1769; Inflation Reduction Act; S. 113 Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2023; S.127 Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act; HR 830/ S 1375 HELP Copays Act; HR 485 Protecting Health Care for All Patients Act; HR 5378 Lower Costs, More Transparency Act; R 2534 PROTECT 340B Act of 2023; HR 3561 the PATIENT Act; S. 1542 DRUG Act; S. 1967 PBM Act; HR 3503 The NIH Clinical Trials Diversity Act; Issues related to cardiovascular disease awareness and treatment; Issues related to Federal Trade Commission; FDA issues; Issues related to patient affordability issues, including copay cards, copay accumulators, copay maximizers, National Benefit Payment Parameters; Biosimilars reimbursement issues, no specific bill; Supply Chain Issues, no specific bill; Issues related to 340B; Issues related to pharmacy benefit managers; Proposed rule: Medicaid Program; Misclassification of Drugs, Program Administration and Program Integrity Updates Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; HR 4818/ S. 2407 Treat and Reduce Obesity Act; S. 2305 Biosimilar Red Tape Elimination Act; S. 2129 Ensuring Access to Lower-Cost Medicines for Seniors Act; Issues related to PAHPA reauthorization; Modernizing and Ensuring PBM Accountability Act (Finance Committee); S. 652/ HR2630 SAFE Step Act; S 2474/ HR 5376 Share the Savings with Seniors Act; S 2456 Protecting Seniors from High Drug Costs Act; HR4881 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit cost sharing for drugs under the Medicare program; HR 3281 Protecting Patients Against PBM Abuses Act; HR 4822 Health Care Price Transparency Act of 2023; S 1339 Pharmacy Benefit Manager Reform Act; HR 2679 Pharmacy Benefits Manager Accountability Act; HR 4507 Transparency in Coverage Act of 2023; HR 1352 Increasing Access to Biosimilars Act of 2023; HR 2880 Protecting Patients Against PBM Abuses Act; Issues pertaining to the implementation of PL 97-414 “Orphan Drug Act,” all provisions; HR 5539 Orphan Cures Act; HR 5547 Maintaining Investments in New Innovation Act; S 3558 BIOSECURE Act; HR 7174 Ensuring Pathways to Innovative Cures (EPIC Act); S Res 566 Cholesterol Education Month 2024; HR 7635 340B PATIENTS Act of 2024; H.R. 5391 / S. 2764 The Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act; H.R.8574 – 340B Affording Care for Communities and Ensuring a Strong Safety-net Act; HR 5376 Share the Savings With Seniors Act; S 3430 Mental Health, Lower Cost Drugs and Extenders Package; BIOCOMPETE (no bill number)- Issues related to prohibiting the export of biotechnology to certain foreign entities; HR 8412 Clinical Trial Modernization Act; S 5573 Skinny Labels, Big Savings Act; HR 10515 American Relief Act….

▲ Issues related to corporate and international tax, including regarding Public Law 115-97, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; Issues related to Puerto Rico; Issues related to OECD negotiations on the taxation of global income; HR 3938 Build it in America Act….

▲ S. 79/HR 1717 Interagency Patent Coordination and Improvement Act of 2023; S. 113 Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2023; S. 1250 Drug-price Transparency for Consumers Act; S.127 Pharmacy Benefit Transparency Act; S. 150 Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023; S. 148 Stop STALLING Act; S. 142 Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars; Federal Trade Commission related issues, no specific bill; Issues related to the Patent Act, no specific bill; Issues related to March-In/Bayh Dole, WTO/TRIPS waiver, no specific bill; Issues related to patent thickets/product hopping;
Issues related to obviousness/double patenting; S.2140 Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023; S.2220/HR 4370 Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership Act; S.1128: A bill to establish special rules relating to information provided with respect to drug applications concerning method of use patents; H.R. 3858/S.1834: A bill to prohibit the President from negotiating or concluding any withdrawal, suspension, waiver, or modification to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights without explicit authorization from Congress; H.R. 3535 Advancing Americas Interests Act; H.R. 5475 Prohibiting Adversarial Patents Act of 2023; S.3385/HR 8333– BIOSECURE Act; BIOCOMPETE (no bill number) — Issues related to prohibiting the export of biotechnology to certain foreign entities; Issues related to FDA/PTO coordination; S.2780 Medication Affordability and Patent Integrity Act; Issues related to skinny labeling; S. 3583/HR 6986 To Address Patent Thickets; S. 1956 Invent It Here, Make It Here Act; S 5573 Skinny Labels, Big Savings Act [Ed. Note: Seriously?!]….

Now you know — and depending on other commitments, we may not separately cover Lilly this quarter, since it only spent $190,000 all in. Indeed, starting next week, postings may diminish overall here — as I spend more of my free daylight hours, in pro bono / street law / ACLU-directed and filed-federal litigation practice, against the largely comically inept Tangerine 2.0 “initiatives”. Onward, resolutely. Ever, onward.

नमस्ते

Epilogue: Long Time Govt. Lawyer Sarah Fabian (Under Tangerine 1.0)… Has Left The Building. She Was The Advocate For NOT Giving Kids A Blanket Or Soap Or Bedding Or A Toothbrush — Under Tangerine 1.0.

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

Well — in the long-running Ms. L. class litigation, in San Diego (before the able and considerate USDC Judge Dana Sabraw), it is surprising (to me, at least) that Sarah Fabian is not going to stick around for Tangerine 2.0.

She also once argued that she couldn’t come to an emergency hearing for kids detained in cages in sweltering heat… because she had agreed to walk a friend’s dog over the weekend. A dog. I. cannot. even.

Moreover, I watched her argue — in the Ninth Circuit (falsely) — that no law requires any of the federal agencies to provide children (they’ve forcibly separated from their parents, and) then detained — in large drafty 60 degree windowless concrete caverns (in winter), so much as a blanket, a toothbrush or soap. [I will append the link to that videotape, below — if I can find it, now deep in my archives. As the able Ninth Circuit Judges asked: “Surely Ms. Fabian, you aren’t going to tell us that not having these things complies with the requirements of ‘safe, and sanitary’ housing for children?!?“]

When pressed as to whether she felt that hers was an unreasonable position to take, as to children alone, in jails, in a country where they mostly do not even understand the language. . . she doubled down to the effect that “the four corners of the decree do not say anything about ‘sleeping‘, your honor”.

Obviously, our treaties (and the consent decree) and the Joint Convention on Asylum Seekers were directly violated by Tangerine 1.0, and the Ninth Circuit, and then the Supremes — so held. Here’s her departing motion. See ‘ya, sister:

…PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Sarah B. Fabian hereby respectfully moves to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendants-Respondents in the above-captioned case on the grounds that her employment with the U.S. Department of Justice will end on January 25, 2025. Defendants will continue to be represented by all remaining counsel of record for Defendants.

Dated this January 21, 2025….

ORDER Granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, Sarah B. Fabian [758] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Sarah B. Fabian terminated.

Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 1/22/2025….

Onward. And good riddance. Out, now — but why leave now, Ms. Fabian? Was it that you just loafed through four years of the Biden Administration? I genuinely want to know.

नमस्ते

Pfizer’s Q4 2024 Lobby Spend — Compared To Prior Three Years — Is Down Quite A Bit…

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

While Amgen has also been a large spender in the last four years, overall — it has been Pfizer (partly due to larger market cap) that led the pack for the last decade among pharma majors.

This year though, Pfizer decided to mostly sit out the election year, making Merck the runaway leader (for the full year). At least for 2024. It seems highly likely Pfizer will spend heavily in 2025 to blunt the Kennedy Jr. effect. All of Tangerine 2.0’s talk about being a populist, and seeking lower drug prices, for consumers… is just that: idle talk. He will do as PhRMA tells him — but Kennedy is a bit of a wild card, at least as to vaccines. Should be entertaining. Here’s Pfizer’s Q4 2024:

▲…Inflation Reduction Act (IRA); HR 7174 – Ensuring Pathways to Innovative Cures (EPIC) Act; Medicare Price Setting; Drug Shortages; Global Access to Medicines; Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR); March-in Framework Guidance and Policies; S 79/ HR 1717 – Interagency Patent Coordination and Improvement Act of 2023; S 142 – Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act; HR 6986 – To address patent thickets; S 150 – Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023; S 2780/ HR 5429 – Medication Affordability and Patent Integrity Act; Antimicrobial Resistance; PBM Transparency and Reform; S 1542 – Delinking Revenue from Unfair Gouging (DRUG) Act; S 3430 – Better Mental Health Care, Lower-Cost Drugs and Extenders Act; S 2973 – Modernizing and Ensuring PMB Accountability Act; 340B Reform; HR 8574 – 340B Affording Care for Communities and Ensuring a Strong Safety-net (ACCESS) Act….

▲ S 723/HR 1458 – Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act; HR 8816 – American Medical Innovation and Investment Act of 2024….

▲ Comprehensive Corporate Tax Reform; Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA); VICP Reform and Excise Tax; Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund; VICP Transition; Comprehensive Federal Tax Reform….

▲ International Supply Chain; HR 4307/S 2115 – Medical Supply Chain Resiliency Act….

Now you know — and I may ignore Lilly this time around, as it only spent $190,000 in the whole fourth quarter. It was always spending less than the peers — but it just. . . disappeared, in Q4. I suspect the plan is a new push on insulins, and on the weight loss meds… here in the new year 2025. We shall see, but maybe they think they don’t need the spend with Tangerine 2.0 in office. If that is the view in Indy… it is an… unwise one, in my experienced opinion. Onward.

नमस्ते

We Will First Look At Just Q4 ’24 Lobby Spend, Then Full Year Trends — First Up? Merck.

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

For the bulk of 2024, Pfizer had radically dropped its lobby spend in the election year — but here in Q4, post the election — it has jumped back up to the top of the leader board, essentially dead even with Amgen.

As a consequence, Merck (which outspent all during the first three quarters) had now fallen back to a more normal $1.7 million spend per quarter. We will have a series of these, on each name below — and then at the end, compare the lot of them to Amazon’s health related lobby spending. [Hint: it dwarfs these.] Here’s Merck — to start us off:

…▲ H.R. 3, (117th Cong.) Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act; H.R. 19, (117th Cong.) Lower Costs, More Cures Act of 2021; H.R. 830, Help Ensure Lower Patient (HELP) Copays Act; H.R. 1503/S. 2916, Prescription Information Modernization Act of 2023; H.R. 2679, Pharmacy Benefits Manager Accountability Act; H.R. 2691, Transparent Prices Required to Inform Consumer and Employers (Transparent PRICE) Act; H.R. 2816, Pharmacy Benefit Manager Sunshine and Accountability Act; H.R. 2880, Protecting Patients Against PBM Abuses Act; H.R. 2940/S. 1355, Pioneering Antimicrobial Subscriptions to End Upsurging Resistance Act (PASTEUR) Act of 2023; H.R. 3290, To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to ensure transparency and oversight of the 340B drug discount program; H.R. 3285, Fairness for Patient Medications Act; H.R. 3633, PREVENT HPV Cancers Act of 2023; H.R. 4368/S. 2131, Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2024; H.R. 4895, Lowering Drug Costs for American Families Act; H.R. 5376/S. 2474, Share the Savings with Seniors Act; H.R. 6283, Delinking Revenue from Unfair Gouging (DRUG) Act; H.R. 7174, To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to equalize the negotiation period between small-molecule and biologic candidates under the Drug Price Negotiation Program; H.R. 7635, The 340B PATIENTS Act of 2024; H.R. 8467, Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2024; S. 150, Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023; S. 1339, Pharmacy Benefit Manager Reform Act; S. 1895 (116th Congress) Lower Health Care Costs Act; S. 2333, Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Response Act; S. 2543 (116th Congress) Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act of 2019; S. 4229, Reducing Drug Prices for Seniors Act….

▲ Issues relating to… 340B program integrity; 340B of the Public Health Services Act; 340B issues; 340B drug pricing program; Drug pricing; Drug pricing and reimbursement issues; Anti-microbial Resistance; Cost and value of medicines; Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) immunization; Vaccines catch up; Vaccines issues; Package inserts, labeling issues, and E-Labeling authorization legislation; Pharmaceutical Supply Channel issues; Drug shortage issues; Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169), issues relating to drug pricing provisions; Issues related to the Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act (PL 96-517); FY-2024 Budget and Appropriations Legislation; Intellectual property protection and trade issues; WTO IP Waiver for COVID therapeutics; Animal Health; Animal Health Technology Issues; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights; Animal Health Policy Issues: ADUFA & Funding for Electronic Animal Traceability; One Health Issues; General pharmaceutical issues; Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP); Diversity in clinical trials; Accelerated approval reform; Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) policy issues; Pharmacy Benefit Manager reforms; Food and Drug Administration issues; Public Health Issues….

▲ H.R. 1613, Drug Price Transparency in Medicaid Act of 2023; H.R. 2666, Medicaid VBPs for Patients (MVP) Act; H.R. 7174, To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to equalize the negotiation period between small-molecule and biologic candidates under the Drug Price Negotiation Program; H.R. 7635, The 340B PATIENTS Act of 2024….

▲ Issues relating to… Medicare; Medicare Part B and D drug pricing issues; 340B program integrity; 340B of the Public Health Services Act; 340B drug pricing program; Drug pricing; Drug pricing and reimbursement issues; FY-2024 Budget and Appropriations Legislation; Medicaid drug rebate program (MDRP); Medicare coverage of COVID antiviral medicines….

▲ Issues relating to… Tax reform and tax policy, generally; Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (P.L. 115-97); Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169), provisions relating to budget reconciliation and taxes….

Now you know — next installment due out this afternoon, if I find the time over lunch. But it is clear that these majors, especially those making vaccines — will need to work on Kennedy Jr. day and night — to avoid his inadvertently causing some vast losses — of human lives.

Ugly, but true.

Onward.

नमस्ते

[U] In The Land Of The Blind… This Guy Is Not A King. Not Even… A Fully-Functioning Adult.

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

So… in his first move toward greater “efficiency in government“, Tangerine 2.0 proposes to pay federal workers… to NOT come to work.

But only if they are DEI employees.

Many of them have what amounts to full property rights in these federal jobs (that is, are immune from being demoted or fired, without a specific performance related issue — well documented), and so, many will sue — saying that targeting them alone, over all others is plainly a “suspect classification“, under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [BTW, Tangerine cannot change Acts of Congress, via his silly black Sharpies.] Most of them are likely to win. That is, they will get both back- and front-pay, be reinstated and maybe even win some punitive damages — for Tangerine 2.0’s targeting of them. Yes — that sure sounds… “efficient”. Not.

On top of that, he attempts to “mandate” that each federal agency “identify” investigative targets for the DoJ, where it is suspected that private employers are… valuing people of diverse backgrounds. Putting aside that no one knows what that might mean, none of those terms appear anywhere in any of these agencies’ grants of authority from the Congress. That is, this directive exceeds the charter the agencies hold, by statute. That will be enjoined in a matter of months if not weeks, from now. But here it is:

…As a part of this plan, each agency shall identify up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of 500 million dollars or more, State and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over 1 billion dollars….

Well… Scott Johnson seems blissfully unaware that Tangerine’s Sharpie only wrote a “dead letter” here.

He — and the low information voters who chose this guy… are already getting just exactly the expensive, silly chaos he promised. Charming.

[And in his signature “law and order” move, he’s pardoned or commuted several hundred people who violently assaulted police officers on J6.] Charming, indeed. Onward — to lobbying trends for Q4 2024 (just released), in life sciences / pharma — up next.

नमस्ते

New Sworn Statement Alleges Pete Hegseth Is A Serial Abuser — Of Both His Ex-Wives…

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

This is the guy is who Tangerine 2.0 wants to lead the Department of Defense.

And as to skill-set, there is no doubt that he has never led any organization of even one one hundred thousandth that size. He bankrupted a charity he ran, with only about 100 employees.

Then, as to “character and integrity” — he’s admitted that he WILL (probably!) stop drinking, if/when he is confirmed as Secretary of Defense.

On that dimension, a new sworn statement has appeared at the Senate hearings, in which the second ex-wife’s sister in law (who has since divorced Pete’s brother) alleges he was so abusive that Pete’s second ex- had a “safe-routine” all mapped — for escapes, and that she had, on occasion locked herself in the closet to avoid his abuse.

Here’s the scoop:

…Senators received an affidavit Tuesday from the former sister-in-law of defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth in which she says his behavior caused his second wife to fear for her safety. The receipt of the affidavit comes after Senate Armed Services Committee staffers were in contact with Hegseth’s former sister-in-law for several days….

And sadly, this is exactly the kind of guy with whom Tangerine 2.0 works best — false bravado, around weaker foes — but will always fold — in a battle of equals, or against his betters.

In fact, he had no business being on air for Faux, we now are learning.

But this is who Trump wants to lead hundreds of thousands of able, fierce, hard working courageous women soldiers?!

Damn. And of course the Powerline boys are mum — because some of them call him their drinking buddy.

But also “don’t offend the Dotard” — is their continuing mantra.

Y I K E S.

[U] Instead Of Tangerine’s Lunacy — He Thinks He Can Amend The 14th Amendment, Solo — I’ll Offer… What Is The Best Of America, From a Few Years Back.

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

Updated 01.22.25 @ 9 PM: Hinderaker tries, a day and night later, to claim the Fourteenth Amendment’s plain meaning doesn’t apply to Tangerine 2.0’s burp. Hilarious. [If people without papers “are not subject to US jurisdiction”, as John claims — then we have no jurisdiction to deport them, or to regulate them in any manner. That alone points out Hinderaker’s obvious and likely intentional “error” in analysis.] End update.

Just click the video. You will thank me for it. As overnight, Tangerine 2.0 signed a meaningless scribble that purported to remove birthright citizenship. He has no such power — and he never will garner such power. So, click this, instead:

To be sure — we won’t list all the ways ALL of what he proposes — on each order — is defective, but this you may count on: about 95% of all of these “orders” are facially defective. Full stop:

…”The Constitution of the United States says that if you are born on our soil, and you are not the child of an ambassador, you are an American citizen. Simply put, if you are born here, you belong here,” Meyerson said. “That’s been the rule from the 14th Amendment right after the Civil War. Supreme Court confirmed that in the 1890s, so the president wants to issue an order saying, ‘I don’t like this. I want to get, get rid of all these kids born here if their parents weren’t citizens,’ and the president has no power to do that….”

And one more video — to remind you — America is much bigger than one vain, degenerate 78 year old felon:

नमस्ते

Mirengoff Gets This One… Right.

~ condor ~ Leave a comment

I’ll just say it: he is finally willing to call a spade… a spade.

Here’s his take on it all:

…This is what things have come to in America. A former president and then-current presidential candidate makes unprecedented statements that raise the prospect of using the criminal justice system to prosecute his political enemies. A sitting president and local partisan prosecutors use the criminal justice against that candidate.

Then, on his way out the door, that president issues a series of unprecedented and problematic preemptive pardons — and, ironically, thereby spares the once-and-future president from shooting itself in the foot.

And then, once that president is installed, he immediately starts a new cycle of disrespect for law and order by pardoning his shock troops for committing violent crimes in the same building where he has just been sworn in as chief enforcer of our laws…

Very good. Now DO something about it — inside your own party, man.