The tight time frame imposed by the federal appeals court is a fair indicator that the panel agrees — this appeal should likely never have been docketed, by a disingenuous AUSA — for Trump.
Again, Abrego will win out, here:
…The motion to suspend briefing is granted. . . .
[Separately,] RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL DUE: 07/09/2026
Response is required to the motion to dismiss appeal in part on or before the due date above….
Onward, resolutely.
नमस्ते
What a monument to stupidity that NYP article was. Devine writes:
Does she not understand what a presidential library is? Has she ever been to a presidential library? Has she seen the statue of Eisenhower, or the giant wall mural of Nixon? It’s stunning to me that MAGA is still sticking to their arrogant-Obama narrative, given their praise for the current POTUS. The collective cognitive dissonance required to maintain both positions would be enough to power a colony on the moon.
LikeLiked by 1 person