[U] Of Course Hinderaker Knows He’s Lying. Again.

Updated: as of Saturday, most of the sensible USDC judges in Minneapolis agree: people cannot be arrested for protesting policies they disagree with in public places, even if they do so and rude and offensive terms.

No arrests. Get that John? Nothing more than misdemeanor disturbing the peace — if it was even that. End update.

As John well knows (but intentionally prevaricates) houses of worship are public gathering places when they are holding an “all comers” Sunday worship service. There can be no trespass, John — unless it grows… violent. It did not. And you know it.

So here he is again, trying to invent felonies out of thin air — essentially thought crimes…

It may be rude to heckle the pastor (who moonlights as an ICE “chaplain”), but it is certainly First Amendment protected so long as there is no violence. And if the church members really dislike it, they can ask security to escort for the protesters out of the church, which is what happened here.

These are all matters of very substantial public concern. And John should just shut his yap. Out.

2 thoughts on “[U] Of Course Hinderaker Knows He’s Lying. Again.

  1. Hinderaker has a “tell” whenever he addresses some bullshit legal matter (a stupid lawsuit, a vindictive arrest, etc.) that he knows is bullshit: At the end of his post, he will always express skepticism that this bullshit legal effort will succeed, but he will preemptively attribute that inevitable outcome to corruption or bias.

    That way, he looks smart and prescient when the case rightfully falls apart, but he doesn’t alientate his drooling readers who are gleefully gobbling up all the MAGA bullshit like pigs at the trough.

    He’s such a mean, disgusting liar.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.