And Now Hinderaker Would Tell Us That The Specious Comey Attempt-And-Fail-Indictment… WASN’T A Political Retribution Hack Job?!

This evening, Hinderaker burps up nonsense, about what Merrick Garland did (or did not do, via his independently-appointed Special Counsels) — about a decade ago, now.

He tries to make the case that Democratic administrations have been known to bring vindictive political indictments — plainly in a move to excuse the preposterous indictments of Jim Comey and Leticia James.

Both were dismissed in mere months, for obvious legal flaws.

OTOH, Garland’s investigations yielded solid indictments, against real crimes.

But my central point here is that a probable cause warrant was properly issued, and executed — at Mar-a-Lago.

[Internal email chatter about it, before the fact is of no evidentiary moment — as John well knows. The case speaks for itself — and judges’ rulings, not John’s wild eyed tin foil hatted theories… decide what evidence is admissable. And, correlatively — whether any of it was the fruit of a poisonous tree,]

All the rest is just so much sturm and drange — from old Johnny-boy.

Here endeth the sermon. And none of it undercuts the clear abuse of legal process, from Trump world — against his perceived enemies in any event, Hinderaker.

Out.

2 thoughts on “And Now Hinderaker Would Tell Us That The Specious Comey Attempt-And-Fail-Indictment… WASN’T A Political Retribution Hack Job?!

  1. John left out the most humiliating part for the DOJ: When the FBI went into Mar-a-Lago, they didn’t find numerous unauthorized, classified documents which Trump had denied possessing and had failed to return, despite repeated requests, and they didn’t find top-secret materials stored haphazardly in places like a bathroom, office, storage room, and bedroom.

    Oh wait. Yes, they did find all of that.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to condor Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.