Mr. Mirengoff is correct this morning, directionally-speaking: drug prices are high in the US. Then he goes on (mostly accurately), to opine as to why that state of affairs persists. The US also enjoys (if one has enough cash) access to the best health care and most revolutionary drugs on the planet — due to vast R&D spending by pharmacos.
[It costs a little over $2 billion now, per drug candidate on average, to seek market approval.]
Then in a “faint praise — stronger skeptic” mode — he gets the nut of it all right, also: Trump’s Sharpie scribbles will likely be useless, because they do nothing to address root causes of high prices (and that is even assuming away the problem that Trump lacks authority to set prices, at all).
Specifically, in the end — he makes an accurate observation about Trump’s NIH idiocy.
So I repeat his here — though far-too-gently stated — Paul is correct in his conclusions:
…[I]t seems clear that if Trump’s Executive Order has its intended effect, the pharmaceutical industry might very well face a double whammy. It will likely lose much of the money it now spends to fund research and its ability to benefit from government-funded research in the U.S. will be sharply reduced.
I’m not arguing against trying to lower the prices Americans pay for prescription drugs. Trump is right to try to bring these prices down. However, he and his team should think carefully — more carefully than I believe they have — about the consequences of slashing funding for NIH and for biomedical research at university labs….
So… this is some progress, at least — from Paul’s keyboard.
Because non-subscribers can’t leave comments on Ringside, I wrote to Paul directly to tell him that I was “surprised” he made no mention of pharmaceutical CEOs, who on average have experienced a 1,085% increase in since 1978. I asked him if he thought their contributions are worth 10,8500 times the value of 1978 CEOs’ efforts. I asked him if he thought that these astronomical salaries (as well as the compensation of board members) were contributing in any way to rising drug prices. I also shared with him that I thought it would also be interesting to compare drug companies’ net profits over the past few decades, or to compare the percentage of gross profits being spent on R&D.
He has not replied.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite so. And at many major pharma companies, the CEO makes over 800 times what the bench lab chemist makes, there.
I am pretty sure their financial engineering is not 800 times more valuable than discovering new drug candidates.
And as long as I am on a rant(!), it is certainly true that doctors in the USA are overpaid — in the EU, they on average earn only 40% of what US docs make.
I am certain that US docs are not 60% smarter than their EU ounterparts.
Here endeth the rant.
Thanks, man!
LikeLike