Yawn. When We Don’t Mention Hinderaker…

…it is not because he’s gone silent.

No, he’s posting lots and lots of items.

But none are of any serious moment — they are, uniformly… insipid.

There he cheers Stephen Miller (a/k/a Brownshirt Lurch), whose bunk legal “theories” are now batting 3-105, in the courts.

The sad truth is — Hinderaker no longer offers anything, in the way of meaningful adult conversation.

All while Tangerine 2.0 has done essentially nothing in 101 days.

Ukraine? Nope.

Tax cuts? Nope.

Wall? Nope.

Ended birthright citizenship? Nope.

Gotten NATO to “pay up”? Nope.

Done anything meaningful — about sane immigration reform? Nope.

Held a car commercial (for his mega-donor) — on the White House lawn? Yup!

Issued a conflicted, ugly shitcoin?! Let it tank? Yup and yup.

Snubbed by other serious leaders, at the Pope’s funeral? Check!

Out.

2 thoughts on “Yawn. When We Don’t Mention Hinderaker…

  1. My favorite recent Hinderaker post is this one, in which he discusses an incident at Harvard in which portraits of Black profesors were vandalized with black tape. He writes:

    The crime, such as it was, was never solved, which I assume means that, like nearly all instances of campus racism, it was an inside job. When it became clear that no progress was being made, I wrote the dean of the law school an email suggesting some investigatory tips. For example, the portraits were covered with glass which in all likelihood bore fingerprints. The dean did not respond to my email, nor, as far as I could tell, was the “crime” looked into any further.

    You mean to tell me that the dean of Harvard Law received an email from a cranky old man, explaining to him the investigative value of fingerprints, and he didn’t respond? Shocking!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to condor Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.