Hey Hinderaker: Who Did These Judges… Beat, With Billy Clubs?!

Tonight, Hinderaker goes… full-on loon, with this:

“…What these robed rebels are doing is vastly closer to an insurrection than anything that was done by the ragtag protesters of January 6, 2021…”_

John’s knickers are in a twist because by a better than ten to one ratio, federal judges, appointed both by Democrats and Republicans — over the last four decades… are almost uniformly ruling against Tangerine 2.0’s lawlessness.

John, that would be because Tangerine 2.0 is egregiously violating the law. The federal law — of very long-standing.

The law that even Ronald Reagan obeyed, and in the main, Bush 43 obeyed; while his father obeyed it even more than 43 did.

It is an indisputable fact that Donald Trump is a convicted felon. And it shows in every move he makes, about 90% of which are deeply disdainful of the rule of law in America. He believes he’s a king. And he is not.

At bottom that is all Hinderaker is burping about.

Calling esteemed federal judges on both sides of the aisle “insurrectionists” — and likening them to the violent mob that stormed the Capital Rotunda (injuring dozens and dozens of police officers as they charged) back on J6…

Just confirms how completely untethered from reality Johnnie Hinderaker has become.

Out

2 thoughts on “Hey Hinderaker: Who Did These Judges… Beat, With Billy Clubs?!

  1. Huh. Was it insurrection when Judge Terry A. Doughty issued a nationwide injunction against a federal mandate requiring healthcare workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19?

    Or when Judge James Wesley Hendrix blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to pause new oil and gas leases on federal lands, ruling that the administration lacked the authority to implement such a moratorium without congressional approval?

    Or when Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk issued a nationwide injunction in requiring the Biden administration to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy?

    Or when Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk (again) suspended the FDA’s (20-year-old) approval of mifepristone?

    Or when Judge Reed O’Connor issued a nationwide injunction against the enforcement of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act?

    Or when Judge Reed O’Connor (again) enjoined the federal government’s definition of marriage as it relates to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.

    Or when Judge Reed O’Connor (again) issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Pentagon from enforcing a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for its Navy Seals.

    Were all of those rulings judicial overreach? Should those judges be impeached for telling an administration what it can and can’t do?

    Or was it all part of the process? Most of the above rulings were either wholly or partially overturned on appeal. Nobody in the administration whined about how those judges should be impeached.

    Worse than Jan. 6? Yeah, okay. Let me know when one of these judges pepper-sprays a police officer and beats him into unconsciousness.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.