[U] So… Hinderaker Doesn’t Understand… Any “Rules of Evidence” In Charging Crimes.

Hinderaker offers a laughably wrong on the law opinion tonight.

If we were to apply his lack of understanding of evidence to what’s already in court, as to Tangerine — he’d be under the jail.

For example, we all know Jared and Ivanka made about $44 million in one year, from foreign sources, while working in the West Wing, with and for… Trump.

But we all also know… no authority has charged, let alone indicted/arraigned Cheetolini — for anything related to those grifts.

Because there is no proof that Trump himself received funds.

So it is… insane that John thinks income to an adult son (or brother) who has never served anywhere in government — without any proof that his father (or brother) ever received a penny — even if we implausibly believe the payments were to curry favor… is any form of crime, by the father.

There is simply no proof the father was aware of the son’s actions, while in office. There is nothing… to any of it — unless Hinderaker’s suggesting that Ivanka’s crimes are attributable to Trump — without a single bank record. Damn son.

Just so, as Jack Smith isn’t claiming Trump was aware, or knew (let alone received anything) when Jared and Ivanka took non US origin influence deals — while in office.

Silly idiot, Hinderaker. It’s all… just silly.

Update: Add to that, that Hinderaker is delusional about Tangerine’s 2024 chances.

Hilarious!

Out.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.