Tangerine Thinks He Can Dictate What A Felony Indictment Is Allowed To Allege — From A Grand Jury, No Less…

Tangerine’s lawyers aren’t the sharpest bunch of tools, in anyone’s shed.

Even so, this is silly. Tangerine has been litigating the notion that parts of what Jack Smith alleges, based on his presentation to the grand jury… inside his own indictment… cannot be shown to the jury, as it will “inflame their passions“.

Yes, well… when one commits seditious felonies against the peaceful transfer of power — and encourages threats on the life of the vice president, and speaker of the house… the language will be… “inflammatory” — because the FACTS are… damaging to his false narrative.

That’s all we really see here — a guy trying to escape the logical inferences from his odious rhetoric on and shortly before… 01.06.21.

He will not succeed. And he is very likely to go to jail, when the dust settles, and a jury returns its verdict, on the evidence. It is especially precious that he is quoting Mr. Rhodes, a disbarred lawyer, convicted felon and former leader of the OathKeepers, who is now serving 17 years for his sedition… in defense of the “harmlessness” of Tangerine’s exhortations.

[The word of a felon doing a 17 year stint, that another indicted felon (set for a March 2024 trial) was NOT the main reason the first felon committed his own felonies… isn’t exactly the best way… to win a motion, bud.]

Suck that, Hinder-puss.

Out.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.