In Which Hinderaker Is More Horrified By… Babies, Than By Male/Male Prison Rape — Or Vicious Beatings…

Well… I needed to get a drink of water, after reading Hinderaker’s latest.

My mouth got all cotton-ie and dry, after it began to sink in to me, that for trans-phobic John Hinderaker, the prospect of a woman being consensually pregnant, while incarcerated… is far more damnable (he says!), than say… in-prison male on male forcible rapes — or the more or less endemic in-prison violence generally, often leading to horrific deaths. [And the “women impregnated in prison” figures are… vanishingly small, when compared to in-prison violent incidents.]

So, my point would be… for all humans, in prisons — male or female — the conditions are generally absurdly awful, especially if compared to the prison conditions in Norway, Sweden or the Netherlands. [And it seems John is unaware (or at least, made no stink about) the FACT that at least part of the reason Elizabeth Holmes had a child last summer, a boy named Will — was to be eligible for a higher end prison placement inside the State of California, where moms are specifically allowed to room-in with their babies. Through age 10, as I understand it. And since she could possibly get sentenced to more than a decade, she’d be beyond child bearing age, when released — so both were likely factors, there.]

Yet, and still — John only “has eyes” for a story about women who slept with humans who still have penises, but now self-identify as… women.

I do wonder… what is HE repressing? Yes, occasionally people scam to get to a safer prison placement. But it doesn’t remotely reach the five alarm fire, as to trans- matters that John would make it out to be (after being puppeteered by Candace Owens, re the same).

Out.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.