In Which Steve Hayward Cries That Hillary “May NOT Have Been” Named For Sir Edmund Hillary?!

Welp. It would be hard to write a better parody, of a sniveler’s supposed GOP critique.

Steve thinks it headline material, here in 2022 — that HRC may not have been named for the famed mountain climber — in the 1940s. By. Her. Parents.

He says that this is proof that Democrats are needy, self aggrandizing mis-fits.

I might wonder aloud why he and Hinderaker defended Tangerine’s serial sexual assaults… as private, personal conduct — not relevant to fitness for office. I might wonder why they defend Matt Gaetz, credibly accused (indicted) for lying about his relationships with, and possibly, sex trafficking younger boys, and drug abuse.

I might wonder… why they defend Ken Paxson, the indicted AG of the State of Texas. I might wonder about their support of Roger Stone (insurrectionist) and Rudy Guliani (law license suspended; caught with his pants down with what he thought was an 18 year old girl in a hotel room — on camera)… I might wonder about… Lauren Boebert, and Marjorie Taylor Green and Cawthorn… on several dimensions, each…

But Hayward wants us to revisit the infancy-years, of life of a woman in her 70s who’s been out of office now for seven years… because maybe the way she was given her birth name… doesn’t meet his personal seal of approval?

[Confidential to Steve — Sir Edmund Hillary was a well-known explorer long before he finally summited Everest — for decades, long before Hillary was born. Your “take-down” is premised solely on the fact that Hillary was two years old by the time he topped Everest?! Are you… kidding?!]

No… actually… you’re just… a joke.