In Which John Complains About A Local Candidate’s “Foul Language”. Precious.

Ok-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-y. I do not condone this local candidate’s colorful language — to be clear.

But Mr. Hinderaker seems to be all in a lather, primarily, or perhaps solely¹… because the local MN candidate is… a black Democrat — and he used some bad language. He updated his post to approve of the following commenter’s statement:

“…UPDATE: Commenter Roxy7 writes: I am old enough to remember when men including Black men would not use that type of profane language in the presence of women, children or the elderly [Ed. note: “Oh…. the humanities!”]. It was something
decent men simply did not do in public. Yet here you have a democrat candidate using this language to address women and what appear to be teenage girls. This profane ignorant ill mannered bitter person is someone democrats think should command respect and be placed in a leadership position? The people who support a man who would speak like this in public will be stunned [when Trump wins — don’t go betting the ranch on it, Roxy7!]….”

I guess Roxy7 and John Hinderaker will now immediately seek the impeachment of the sitting preznit. [The money quote: “grab her by the pu$$y” on tape, no less.]

He is… ostensibly the leader of their party — and more gravely — the free world (for now).

You people certainly missed the portion of your English Lit. class syllabus… on irony.

Out, grinning….

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

^{1. I have read John’s posts for going on seventeen twelve years now. And not once — ever — has he complained about Trump using vile epithets to refer to women and their anatomy. Not once. The thing speaks for itself, as we say in the law — or in this case, its silence… does.}

“Irony — thy name is… Hinderaker.”