Um….

Whatever.

Eye-roll. Candace Owens Farmer yesterday tweeted that “the hill” she “would [be willing to] die on” was… wait for it — being forced to get vaccinated for COVID-19 [though she’s clearly been vaccinated to attend Connecticut’s public schools, in the past].

I replied that she should “be my guest“, to do so — and that we all die of something or another. I also said — in the mean time, she would soon be permanently barred from entering England, to visit her in-laws, and her young son would never visit his grandparents there, if she stuck to this silly “dying hill” remark.

This, my friends at Twitter deemed… unacceptable speech. I guess because I suggested we are all… mortal. Whatever. I run my own property — so I could care less; it will remain here, for eternity, friends.

Seriously… I don’t care, Tweet mods — but I post this here — just to preserve the FACTUAL record. I also posted on that tweet-reply of mine (see at lower left) a link to the outcome of her specious (and now dismissed) Delaware suit alleging she was defamed by Zuck, and Facebook (as well as claiming that the same tortiously-interfered with her “contractual rights” — to receive payments for clicks at Facebook, due to her limited account / temporary suspension).

Hilarious.

Well… she lost on all of that back in July 2021. Yet she still has a web site seeking donations for legal fees, on the case — where the last update is February 2021, and the “still awaiting a decision” from the judge lie… is told, even tonight — November 5, 2021.

The able judge dumped her claims, at a summary stage, as completely unsupported by evidence.

Now you know. [Use your mouse to highlight below this line, and see more. Cheers.]

…USA Today and another media organization, Lead Stories LLC, got a Delaware judge to throw out defamation, tortious interference, and unfair competition claims challenging their fact-checking of coronavirus-related Facebook posts by conservative political commentator Candace Owens.

Judge Craig A. Karsnitz dismissed the case from Delaware Superior Court, finding that the posts by Owens contained falsehoods and misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic, not the fact-checking articles.

Because Owens is a public figure, First Amendment principles required her to show that statements about her in the news stories were false, disparaging, and made with “actual malice,” meaning without any effort to determine whether the statements were factual or not….