Paul Mirengoff’s is… easiest. We will take it first. In it — he purports to speak for a civil rights leader (perhaps THE civil rights leader) felled by an assassin’s bullet now 56 years ago. He purports to tell us that… Dr. King would have opposed BLM.

We need not give that even a moment’s thought. The author speaks of nothing he ever knew — or knows.

It is pathetic, actually. And yet so… “on brand“. A privileged older whyte Stanford Law grad telling us what a Black man who died among garbage workers in Memphis 50-some years ago would think? Hard. Pass. Nope. No thanks.

Elizabeth Stauffer (this morning) tries to sell us an eeriely similar a busload of nonsense — about a transparently partisan suit against the NARA, about a vice president’s email accounts… from now almost a decade ago.

How do we know it is a partisan stunt? Because this same strike plaintiff organization never filed suit against not just MISSING Trump emails… and NOT JUST off-grid cell phones he used on J6, AND NOT JUST money he openly stole in perks for the DC hotel he owned while at 1600 Penn… BUT ALSO NEVER FILED SUIT over the top secret documents he PLAINLY… STOLE.

C’mon Bitsy — this is a wildly-amateurish effort, even by your low bar for such BS.

Out.