I will simply point to page 42, here. There is much more — but this is at the heart of all the rest.

She agrees that the evidence supports that masks save lives. She never discusses the balancing of a couple hours of inconvenience of wearing one, against dead people.

She simply steps over it, illogically asserting avoiding killing people is not sufficient “good cause”. That is frankly insane. For fifty years people have worn seat belts — under force of law… lobbied by the insurance industry.

But no one flinches, because everyone knows it likely will save one’s life, in a bad crash.

She would tell us all that matters is her personal autonomy — that, and that she doesn’t like that the government moved quickly to mitigate an indisputable pandemic. Over 900,000 dead in the US alone. But because Tangerine dawdled for two years… she thinks that’s how it ought to be. Fifty years of black letter law (and Supreme Court precedents) contradict her. And she makes no attempt to grapple with cases that have come out the other way on this very question. She ignores them.

The mark of lower third law student, that.

Out.