Overnight, Mirengoff wastes about ten paragraphs, burping nonsense, to supposedly defend the Tangerine moron’s right to call his opponents “stupid“.

Y A W N.

Sure, he has that right — and “stupid” by itself (in a debate in an academic vacuum) may not be racist, or sexist. But Paul entirely neglects to mention Tangerine’s… “context“. In front of the NABJ in Chicago, he spoke for five minutes about how he “can’t tell” if she is Black or Asian Indian.

He has called her “Cacklin’ Kamala” (a witch), and “re-truthed” memes on his platform that mis-spell her name, in order to refer to her… by her genitals.

He’s sent out riffs on who (he falsely claims) she was a Jezebel with.

So, yeh — Paul, that one word adjective, standing alone — may not be racist. But all his others, in context, make it clear that for him, this is a dog-whistle to [purported] Whyte supremacists… that she’s a mud person, and a loose-womyn, to boot.

Most of all, though, I write to laugh that Paul thinks Tangerine is not — by a wide margin — the dumbest preznit we’ve ever seen. He can barely read — and he thought that Mississippi was Alabama on a map he used to explain… hurricanes.

Damn, Paul. He thinks the fictional cannibal Hanibal Lector is… his “good friend”.

You should sit this one out.