Idiot.

The CDC has published multiples of risk reduction. So, a higher number (of risk reduction) is actually… wait for it… BETTER. More protective. [And it stands to reason, as a matter of pandemic bio-science, that a combination of vaccination, and prior COVID-19 exposure and recovery will be more protective that either one alone. That’s how one’s immune system “learns” to fight viral agents. Sheesh.]

Last night, Hinderaker wrote that the latest CDC study shows that getting exposure to COVID, while unvaccinated, is more protective than would be one’s chances, in the same population, after vaccination.

That is demonstrably untrue, even in the pull-quote he provided.

The guy’s cheese has slid off his… cracker. [Or, more likely… it is intentional disinformation, for his Q-addled readership, to distract — since Rudy is going down in flames, along with Baby T. See next post.]

Out.