In Which Hinderaker Would Substitute His (Suspect) Judgment, For That Of British Courts Of Law… Yawn.

Well… overnight, Hinderaker decides he should tell British authorities what sorts of protests are allowable in that nation — and what sorts… are not.

Uh-huh.

This is a weird, but tiny, impotent echo — of Tangerine’s comments last week: Trump said that Europe risks losing what it means to be “European” (by which he means… whyte), if it continues to allow immigration in the numbers it has over the past decade. [He called it civilizational erasure. Implicit in this comment is the notion that only whyte people are truly “civilized“, and if more brown, yellow and black people take up residence in a nation (than whyte) — the civilization… ends. That sure sounds like a tiny mustachioed guy, from the early 1930s. One the world united to defeat — and forced into a suicide — in a bunker under the Reich Chancellery building, in Berlin. Ick.]

It may be one thing for the US president to scold his European allies, on internal matters — ones that do not affect the US. [That too is odious, though, in truth.]

It is entirely another for a demented old coot in the USA to pop off about what is free expression in the UK. John does not seem to understand that the law of protest differs from our set of precepts, in several important ways, in the UK. It is not his place to tell the Brits how to do things.

To be clear, I do not much care for this protest, but the crown jewels were not stolen, nor damaged in any way.

The case housing them was splatterd with food — to make the point that many many Britons are going hungry — while the Royals hold vast banquets, dripping in jewelry.

But no permanent harm was done.

John wishes to substitute his vindictiveness, for the even handed, tolerant justice of the British court system. Good luck with that, you delusional old fart.

What a tiny handed miscreant he is. Out.