Well, these goofs have never been the model of logical reasoning, but this is just… silly.

Last night, both John and Scott roundly praised Judge Mizelle’s no-mask decision for airplanes. This after she herself ruled that masks reduce viral transmission, based on competent evidence.

This morning, Scott devotes about 15 paragraphs to proving her… wrong.

Which is it, boys?

Is she qualified — or not?

Spoiler alert: she — like you two, and Steve H. — is not much at logic.

If masks save lives, and she and you oppose them… which of your relatives are you folks willing to sacrifice… in order to avoid the small inconvenience of (perhaps) saving their lives?

Cheers, boys.