Instead of giving any more oxygen to his, and Lee Zeldin’s lies… let us recall that the Supremes no longer follow the text of the Environmental Protection Act of 1976, as written.

This despite Scalia’s insistence that all conservative judges simply read the statute in its original form, and apply the plain meaning of the words and phrases Congress enacted.

We have seen, time and again, if powerful businesses have skin in the game — the Roberts court, usually with Gorsuch or Barret holding the pen — finds “entire gray elephants, lurking in tiny mouse holes“… (with the dissents of Kagan and Sotomayor and Jackson keeping them honest — about what it is they are ACTUALLY doing).

So spare me your lies — the entire thesis of the Hinderaker post — quoting Lee Zeldin… is false. It is pinned to a low level EPA functionary, wire-tapped/trapped on a hidden recording without consent, by an old Project Veritas skunk.

[Subsequently, the entire “Veritas” operation was bankrupted by its repeated pattern unlawful recordings of private conversations, and lies about those conversations’ content. The hearsay offered is corroborated by exactly zero documentary proof of any corruption — at all. Just “Veritas’ lies“.]

In sum, I’ll offer you two no tiny violins, buddy.

Suck it. And do see some more recent reality, in court decisions — about the EPA, as described by the dissents. Out.