At the Supremes over the weekend, the Tangerine 2.0 forces openly admitted that their attack on birthright citizenship was a “modest” proposal. By that I assume they meant… “well, at least we aren’t presently proposing… concentration camps.”

But by saying a thing is only modestly unlawful (in one’s own view, at least). . . doesn’t make it in any manner allowable, old Tangerine.

…But at this stage, the government comes to this Court with a “modest” request: while the parties litigate weighty merits questions, the Court should “restrict the scope” of multiple preliminary injunctions that “purpor[t] to cover every person * * * in the country”….

So… we have a human right, for over a century — and Trump thinks he can kill it, and say only people who sue, individually may keep it — while he attempts to end a Constitutional guaranteed right — with his lil’ black Sharpie, alone?

That is the most preposterous thing I’ve read since… “three-fifths of a person is how we will count you.”

Out.

नमस्ते