Hinderaker Is Right About One Thing, Here…

He writes — regarding the coming 2024 national elections — “the federal courts will likely be an issue that helps Democrats rather than Republicans….”

He also acknowledges that even Rasmussen polling now shows a very potent “back-lash vote”, going into 2024 — as a result of the Supremes’ activism in Dobbs. We saw it in the 2022 mid-terms.

And ominously for the GOP, it is the college educated, deep suburban/exurb whyte married housewives’ vote that utterly eradicated the GOP candidates who claimed strong “pro-life” ties.

Welcome to the law of… “elections have… consequences“; so too, do Supremes’ radical hard right activist decisions, there John!

Out.

I Guess It Depends On What “Waive” And “Modify” Might Mean — Ridiculous.

The word means only what I say it means, Alice….” [I guess I got this one wrong because I foolishly assumed the six Supremes could read the Oxford English Dictionary. Yikes.]

To be certain, there are multiple work-arounds to make this decision…

so much sturm and drang. From Justice Kagan’s very wise dissent, then, a bit:

…One prior action, nowhere counted by the majority, is the suspension of loan payments and interest accrual begun in COVID’s first days. That action cost the Federal Government over $100 billion, and benefited many more borrowers than the forgiveness plan at issue. See supra, at 21. And second, it’s all relative. Past actions were more modest because the precipitating emergencies were more modest. (The COVID emergency generated, all told, over $5 trillion in Government relief spending.) In providing more significant relief for a more significant emergency — or call it unprecedented relief for an unprecedented emergency — the Secretary did what the HEROES Act contemplates. Imagine asking the enacting Congress: Can the Secretary use his powers to give borrowers more relief when an emergency has inflicted greater harm? can’t believe the majority really thinks Congress would have answered “no.”

In any event, the statute Congress passed does not say “no.” Delegations like the HEROES Act are designed to enable agencies to “adapt their rules and policies to the demands of changing circumstances.” FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. S. 120, 157 (2000). Congress allows, and indeed expects, agencies to take more serious measures in response to more serious problems….

That’s all I’ll say, for now.

But the phrase “major questions” appears nowhere in the Constitution. Out.

नमस्ते

Hinderaker: Compare/Contrast Claims Of Crimes.

Tonight, Hinderaker casually admits (see the last sentence of his fifth paragraph) what every lawyer looking at it knows: whatever GOP Rep. Comer might say Mr. Biden might have done or not done… there will be no way to prove any part of it wasn’t all legitimate policy. In other words, there is no chance of proving any corrupt motive.

And John knows this whole pile of garbage… goes nowhere good for the GOP.

All it will do (Comer’s utter lack of proof) is serve to remind all thinking and independent voters that they’ve heard Trump in his own voice, on tape sharing stolen top secrets with a PAC operative for political gain against Mr. Biden and his sitting party while President.

He was swapping treason level (or at least espionage level secrets he personally STOLE!) with political allies to damage Democrats, while the latter were in office.

Duly… elected office. By the people.

A more corrupt motive (and from his own mouth!) can scarcely be imagined.

The GOP is… DOA for 2024, John.

Updated Friday morning — for fun, consider EW’s chart comparing Manafort to Huner:

Out.

Now Thrice — In Under Ten Days?! Hayward Quotes The Dead Unabomber — With Approval. He Needs… An Intervention.

This evening, because he is angry that the Supremes didn’t give him all he wanted in the Harvard/UNC decision, he pointedly brings up the now dead Unabomber to say that sociopath well-understood “the left”. [At base — he’s mad because “the left” knows the ruling he wanted is… Unconstitutional — and Chief Justice Roberts well knows it.]

This is — at best — a poor look, for a frothy hard right law and order guy, like Steve. [See also, the first one in Steve’s weird series.]

And it seems to point to an underlying and unhealthy fascination… with terrorist serial killers.

Bomb makers, insanely bent on destroying modern post industrial America.

A guy who spent at least the last 15 years of his life… in a SuperMax prison.

Steve — I think you should see a good shrink — and listen to what s/he says. It is very disconcerting, that you are unable to find better sources critical of what you think of as liberal thought.

Seriously, man. Get help. Or up the Ketamine doses. Either way… I’m easy.

This is a very disturbing line of argument. No kidding.

Wow.

UPDATE: Coming Motion Deadlines, In The Ill-Starred Merck (DC Federal Courts) Suit Against The Feds — To Keep Older, Mature Retail US Drug Prices “Nice And High”…

We check in once more, this afternoon — before the time off-grid again in the mountains… to offer what all was decided last night, by the able USDC Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, in terms of the immediate schedule in this ill-starred suit we’ve started covering, in DC.

Here is the meat of it — and the full PDF:

…1. [Merck] shall file its motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support thereof by July 11, 2023 [Condor sez that is a very tight and abrupt turn-around time-table, given most of next week is off-grid with the holiday!];

2. [HHS and CMS; federal government agencies] shall file a single memorandum in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment and opposing Plaintiff’s motion by September 11, 2023;

3. Plaintiff shall file a combined reply in support of its motion and opposition to Defendants’ cross-motion by October 19, 2023;

4. Defendant shall file a reply in support of their cross-motion by November 21, 2023….

Now you know… grin. This will be a good one for turgid, overwrought and colorful prose, from Merck’s lawyers. Heh.

नमस्ते

A Return To The Power Alley: Phase I/II Trial Now Dosing, For “Sudan Variant” Ebola Vaccine Candidate: Per IAVI

As we have long reported (see any of over 400 posts at the main site; search “ebola” in the box at upper left on the main site), there is/was no approved vaccine for the Sudan strain that struck Uganda and South Sudan in outbreaks, last fall. [And it does seem… equitable, that the leading risk, to the extent there is one, be from time to time shouldered by first volunteers here in the states.] And to be sure, this is what true blue patriotism looks like, as we approach the Fourth again.

Jumping back to Uganda in 2022, and thankfully so, the outbreak was arrested in early stages by rapid detection and isolation. So rapid, in fact, the vaccine candidate could not reach the front-lines in time to be tested in ring-fashion. So now, 36 brave, healthy US volunteers, with no known exposure to any version of Ebola have been dosed with the experimental candidate — and will be followed for six months. Here’s the latest:

…A vaccine candidate for a type of Ebola virus has been administered to human beings for the first time, the International Aids Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) has announced.

The first participants in this trial were vaccinated in the United States this week. IAVI said in a statement that about 36 healthy adults will be enrolled and followed for six months after vaccination to monitor their safety and immune responses….

To be certain, this is good news — and is how solid pandemic amelioration science works. Kudos to those willing to be first “test pilots” on this initiative. May they — and we all — be rewarded, with a new tool to save lives in sub-Saharan Africa.

Onward, smiling — ever onward.

नमस्ते

Meanwhile, In Actually IMPORTANT “Espionage-By-Former-POTUS” News…

The Powerliners have whined about some tangential remarks made by a low level IRS employee, claiming to be a whistle-blower. Remarks about a person who has never held any office, at any level — nor any executive role in any political party. Unfortunate — but small potatoes — for which he has accepted responsibility. Whatever, boys.

Here is what it is all intended to deflect from: Tangerine personally showing highly classified stolen documents (in this case, a map) to a Trump-aligned PAC executive in mid-2021, at his club.

She will be called to testify, in his felonies trial. And Tangerine will… indeed, burn (per ABC):

…Susie Wiles, one of Trump’s most trusted advisers leading his second reelection effort, is the individual singled out in Smith’s indictment as the “PAC Representative” who Trump is alleged to have shown a classified map to in August or September of 2021, sources said.

Trump, in the indictment, is alleged to have shown the classified map of an unidentified country to Wiles while discussing a military operation that Trump said “was not going well,” while adding that he “should not be showing the map” to her and “not to get too close….”

So — to recap: Trump stole top secret documents, and then knowingly, intentionally, waved them about over a year and a half after he left office, describing the content of the same to a high ranking political party operative, solely for use in a political operation — against the currently serving opposition party (Democratic) POTUS.

Damn… Power-boys: where is your outrage, about THAT?!

Erh… Honestly… So, What? YAWN.

Justices Sotomayor and Jackson (in dissents, at page 68, as one example) have the better of the arguments. That much is certain.

And yes, this is indeed a disappointing bit of unhinged activism — by the increasingly radical conservative wing, untethered from real world, lived experiences of people of color.

But it is silly to think it changes… much. As the Sotomayor dissent makes plain below, colleges have a myriad of other, still plainly lawful tools — to make sure that people of limited means, and diverse backgrounds are seated at the nation’s most coveted institutions of higher learning.

In short, life will go on. And the frothy hard right will be unable to do much of anything about it. The arc of the moral universe… will still bend toward… progress, for peoples descended from those enslaved by those who now (at least in some measure) will seek, and fill the seats that might previously have been available to a person whose own great grand-parents fought their way out of bondage. Yes, life will go on. Here’s the opinion, and the dissent:

…At its core, today’s decision exacerbates segregation and diminishes the inclusivity of our Nation’s institutions in service of superficial neutrality that promotes indifference to inequality and ignores the reality of race….

Notwithstanding this Court’s actions, however, society’s progress toward equality cannot be permanently halted. Diversity is now a fundamental American value, housed in our varied and multicultural American community that only continues to grow. The pursuit of racial diversity will go on. Although the Court has stripped out almost all uses of race in college admissions, universities can and should continue to use all available tools to meet society’s needs for diversity in education. Despite the Court’s unjustified exercise of power, the opinion today will serve only to highlight the Court’s own impotence in the face of an America whose cries for equality resound. As has been the case before in the history of American democracy, “the arc of the moral universe” will bend toward racial justice despite the Court’s efforts today to impede its progress. Martin Luther King “Our God is Marching On!” Speech (Mar. 25, 1965)….

[And, Justice Jackson:] Do not miss the point that ensuring a diverse student body in higher education helps everyone, not just those who, due to their race, have directly inherited distinct disadvantages with respect to their health, wealth, and well-being. Amici explain that students of every race will come to have a greater appreciation and understanding of civic virtue, democratic values, and our country’s commitment to equality. The larger economy benefits, too: When it comes down to the brass tacks of dollars and cents, ensuring diversity will, if permitted to work, help save hundreds of billions of dollars annually (by conservative estimates)….

Somehow this dark gray (wildfire driven) hazy sky — not luminous at all, but solely. . . stultifying, seems an apropos set-backdrop — on a morning where the largely lily whyte radical right wing of the court… told kids who struggle against odds the court’s own lilly whyte nephews and nieces never even have to witness, let alone endure. . . that “we six find your experiences not worthy of consideration, at all”. The six dismissed them, out of hand. Damn. But yet and still… they will… rise.

Onward. Ever, onward.

नमस्ते

Paul Mirengoff Ought To Just Admit It: Trump’s Brand Of “Populism” Is Anti-Democratic. Period.

Tonight, obviously lacking anything useful to say, Paul decides to go after a former CoC (44), about remarks on how our vast and widening wealth gaps in America make our democracy less stable. No sensible person disputes this.

So, instead of making any real, measured argument, Paul goes all 19th Century — and says (in a time when many — perhaps 3/5ths of us… could not even read!) “the democracy” held together in the time of robber barons. Well — yes… mostly true, because tens of millions were functionally enslaved and twenties of millions were… indentured to the robber barons.

So, I guess his “argument” (such as it is) is that we should stop the information economy, all move out on to dirt roads with no phone lines, internet or newspapers. Sure — that’s a “more stable”… something — but it is NOT democracy. Democracy dies… in such darkness. A literate electorate is the best defense against the tyranny of Tangerine, in truth.

In fact, falling literacy… now, that is the recipe for a… revolution (or J6 mayhem more precisely) — it always has been. See, Marie Antoinette.

As if to prove he knows he’s making an insipid argument — he offers this up, himself — voluntarily, about Trump’s time (2016-2020):

…Polling in 2020 found that the higher a person’s income, the more likely they were to say the economy would improve more in a second term of Trump than under Joe Biden. In the 2020 election, Trump did better among voters making more than $50,000 per year than he did among voters making less than $50,000 per year….

So… his criticism of Mr. Obama in fact accepts the truth of what Barack said.

He just doesn’t like what it means for 2024, and Trump — who may well be running from a jail cell in the general in 2024.

Bub-bye, Paulie.