There is little more that need be said here… about Paul’s endless mediocre old whyte guy mansplaining.
And while the Wa Po article itself is a worthy and thought-provoking read… nothing Paul wrote merits reflection.
So I’ll drop it here.
Out.
We respond…
There is little more that need be said here… about Paul’s endless mediocre old whyte guy mansplaining.
And while the Wa Po article itself is a worthy and thought-provoking read… nothing Paul wrote merits reflection.
So I’ll drop it here.
Out.
And yes, Hinderaker burped this past week that Mr. Smith being diligent was “improper chutzpah” in Trump’s J6 case.
As I say… this three pager is… hilarious — and devastatingly… correct on the applicable federal crim. pro. law and rules.
He’s going… down.
This is on a very short fuse, and appropriately so.
At this moment in history, I can scarcely think of a more important (and largely untested, and thus novel) question.
So, we will now see Tangerine’s brief in 14 days, and Colorado’s by the end of the month.
Onward, grinning. But Ms. Alina Habba did her client (Trump) no favors last night — by declaring on a public broadcast, that Justice Kavanaugh “will step up” and rule for Trump — on the merits.
That sort of… churlish and very public jaw-boning… always pisses competent jurists off — even if they are leaning ones’ way. And Kavanaugh is… competent.
Here’s the terse order ganting review, in full:
“…TRUMP, DONALD J. V. ANDERSON, NORMA, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The case is set for oral argument on Thursday, February 8, 2024. Petitioner’s brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support or in support of neither party, are to be filed on or before Thursday, January 18, 2024. Respondents’ briefs on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support, are to be filed on or before Wednesday, January 31, 2024. The reply brief, if any, is to be filed on or before 5 p.m., Monday, February 5, 2024….”
Be excellent to one another — but I see this as a clear at least 5-4 “states’ rights” decision. That is, at least five justices will hold that the state of Colorado is allowed to set rules about ballots, and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is unambiguous.
So… I’ll go out on a limb here, and say I think Tangerine is off the ballot come March 1, in Colorado (and perhaps four other states/commonwealths).
Out.
नमस्ते
A dose of reality, from EmptyWheel, this afternoon:
…After three years of concerted propaganda effort (from the hard right), thin majorities still believe:
January 6ers were “mostly violent” (50%)
Punishments for Jan6ers have been fair or not harsh enough (73%)
Trump bears responsibility for January 6 (53%)
DOJ is treating Trump like anyone else (57%)
Trump telling his mob to march to the Capitol threatened democracy (51%)
The mob entering the Capitol threatened democracy (58%)
Congress voting against certifying the election threatened democracy (53%)
The attack on the Capitol should never be forgotten (55%)
There is no solid evidence of widespread voter fraud (63%)
Only on whether Trump’s role disqualifies him for the presidency (or Republican members of
Congress who voted to disqualify votes) did less than a majority vote for democracy (46%)….And… there are about 7% of Republicans who recognize that Trump was in the wrong. Most independents agree with Democratic views on January 6, not Republicans….
Thank you EmptyWheel!
It has been a minute since I’ve posted comment/reply style here.
But this is an excellent countervailing view, so let’s get it up top here:
…Anonymous said…
Back in the 90s Pharma had a problem with “parallel imports” in Europe of low cost products from countries such as Spain, Italy, and Greece to high cost locations such as Germany.
Pharma knows the expected usage in each country and when low cost countries started to purchase excess amounts to sell in high price countries pharma simply cut them off at the expected amounts so that their own populations suffered from exports.
Several years ago pharma threatened the same thing with Canada if they started shipping too much to the US.
This is never going to work.
January 5, 2024 at 2:57 PM….
[My reply: threedaycondor said…]
I do hear you, my long term erstwhile Anon.
Permit me to disagree, politely of course.
The difference now is that the actions of cutting off Canada suppliers will come from US soil, and impact US consumers.
That invokes jurisdictional means (interstate commerce) of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. And, any retaliatory action — against an importer (from Canada) based on price, here on US soil that impacts US consumers… is an unlawful resale price maintenance attempt, and pretty clearly violates US antitrust law (see, in this regard, both the Martin Shkreli FTC action, and the recent class settlement of the (Norfolk, VA, but) federal Zetia anti-trust suit.
It will be litigated, that much is certainly true. [At a minimum, Big Pharma will have to dream up a non-price reason for limiting access in Canada. That’ll be a tall order, given this three decades of history — as you point out.]
But the feds could settle by saying “Look, either you’re going to sit down and negotiate fairer US prices, or we are going to break open the patent vault on essential medicines, and make them ourselves“.
Or — “we, the feds” will import from Canada, and pay for all the Canadian legal bills — and just run out the clock on pharma.
In sum… there is not much Big Pharma can do… if the feds truly play hard ball.
And that is what this “shot across the bow” implies.
[It also puts FL Gov. DeSantis (GOP) in the position of having to partner up with the feds — to fight big pharma. Delicious.]
And least to my crinkly, smiling green Irish eyes… that’s how it looks.
Indeed, Anon., great stuff!
Do stop back!
Namaste….
January 5, 2024 at 3:23 PM
Now: What do YOU think?
Don’t be shy!
नमस्ते
To be clear — I still think it wiser to beat him outright at the ballot box, and end his ersatz martyrdom schtick.
But two more states have now moved to keep Tangerine off the ballots (technically, one is a Commonwealth, but you get the main idea).
As I said previously, the burden of this much litigation alone, just to get on the ballot, state by state… may well mean that the GOP must choose another at its convention — as a nominee for 1600 Penn, in 2024.
And we all know… then, Trump will launch a Quixotic third party bid.
So no matter how you slice it, the GOP winds up as colossal losers.
What’s not… to like?
Even if the Supremes rule he may stay on all state ballots… his own chaos brand is now the karma… spinning out, against him.
नमस्ते
We had long predicted the insurers would not escape liability by claiming it was an act of war exclusion from coverage. Businesses pay large sums, and insurers reap fat profits from blue chip, stable companies by selling “business interruption” insurance. Very few events that truly disrupt a multinational like Merck… ever occur. But when one does, it is usually for boxcar numbers, as our prior coverage indicated, at the time.
Then the insurers tried to keep the premiums, but not cover Merck’s losses. Yikes. That wouldn’t end well, we said.
And so, at every trial and appellate level since, in New Jersey state courts, Merck has prevailed in showing it had both fully paid its premiums, and thus had contractual “business interruption” coverage — from the insurers — for these malware infestations.Here’s the latest, from FiercePharma, reporting:
…Merck has reportedly settled with insurance companies that contested the pharma giant’s $1.4 billion claim after it was victimized by a crippling cyberattack in 2017.
With the settlement—terms of which were not disclosed—the insurance companies avoided a ruling that would have provided a precedent for other cases involving insurance claims related to other state-led cyberattacks, Bloomberg Law reports.
Six Russian military intelligence officers were eventually charged by the United States in the “NotPetya” ransomware cyberattacks, which targeted accounting software developed by a Ukrainian company that was used by Merck and several other companies. Malware infected more than 40,000 computers in Merck’s global network….
Now you know, and this is very good news for Merck.
In fair balance, though — See the new one, immediately below — on how reimportation, long a boogeyman out of Canada — going back to the HRC (never enacted) health plan of 1994, and the early BHO ACA drafts of 2009-10… is finally becoming a reality, due in no small part to Merck’s petulant suit against the feds. Grin.
नमस्ते
Of course, PhRMA will sue. It will claim that FDA cannot allow “unsafe” medicines into the US market. But assuming the federal FDA laws and rules mean what they say, the FDA has the power to grant state government entities the ability to purchase non-US sourced prescription drugs and biologics. Afterall, these Canadian drugs in particular are made in US facilities, and just re-labeled and shipped to Canada.
In any event, Florida is the first through the gate — here, in 2024. But this is something Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 1994 Health Care initiative sought but was unable to achieve. An early draft of what became the ACA of 2010 — or Obamacare, also provided for reimportation. But it was dropped from the final bill, to garner enough votes to pass.
Personally, I have to wonder if… the silly strike suits, against HHS and CMS and the VA, claiming that drug companies like Merck need not negotiate on price… have led to this moment at FDA. That and the endless price increases, on even very old medicines. Mr. Davis likely has only himself to blame for the idea that next, his lawyers will be fighting in local Florida courts to prevent that state from buying the very same drugs in Canada as roll off the line in New Jersey… albeit with a new label plastered on the side of the vials. So it goes. Here is the latest, from The NYT, this morning:
…The Food and Drug Administration has allowed Florida to import millions of dollars worth of medications from Canada at far lower prices than in the United States, overriding fierce decades-long objections from the pharmaceutical industry.
The approval, issued in a letter to Florida Friday, is a major policy shift for the United States, and supporters hope it will be a significant step forward in the long and largely unsuccessful effort to rein in drug prices. Individuals in the United States are allowed to buy directly from Canadian pharmacies, but states have long wanted to be able to purchase medicines in bulk for their Medicaid programs, government clinics and prisons from Canadian wholesalers.
Florida has estimated that it could save up to $150 million in its first year of the program, importing medicines that treat H.I.V., AIDS, diabetes, hepatitis C and psychiatric conditions. Other states have applied to the F.D.A. to set up similar programs.
But significant hurdles remain. The pharmaceutical industry’s major lobbying organization, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, which has sued over previous importation efforts, is expected to file suit to prevent the Florida plan from going into effect. Some drug manufacturers have agreements with Canadian wholesalers not to export their medicines, and the Canadian government has already taken steps to block the export of prescription drugs that are in short supply.
“Canada’s drug supply is too small to meet the demands of both American and Canadian consumers,” Maryse Durette, a spokeswoman for Health Canada, wrote in an email message. “Bulk importation will not provide an effective solution to the problem of high drug prices in the U.S….”
Dr. Robert Califf, the F.D.A. commissioner, said in a statement that the agency will be vetting additional state applications to be sure they live up to the program’s goals.
“These proposals must demonstrate the programs would result in significant cost savings to consumers without adding risk of exposure to unsafe or ineffective drugs,” Dr. Califf said….
This is — indeed — a sea change. And more good news for consumers, here early in 2024. Though it may be late 2025, before the suits are put to bed, and Canadian inventory reaches state medical aid providers’ shelves — for seniors, and low income Americans.
Pharma will also likely try to end contracts with some Canadian sources, claiming breach — but this is going to be the “new normal”… all because pharma won’t negotiate in good faith on prices, inside the US. Onward.
नमस्ते
And… John wants to invoke racial animus — again tonight.
A smash and grab (at a restaurant) happened in Compton, California overnight.
Yawn. Crime… eventually happens everywhere, John. It’s a law of probabilities.
But no… John connects this… to a whyte lawyer who got beat up (wait for it) over 20 years ago — in Compton (at a courthouse). By a gang.
Why would these be… related? Why?!
Well… Because to Johnnie, all crime looks alike: it’s always… (manifestly falsely) brown, or Black.
What a loser… demented, bitter old coot.
These two morons… can’t tell the difference between threatening to hang the sitting Veep, for certifying a peaceful transfer of power, after a lawful election — by smashing in windows, and doors, and beating DC police officers… and ransacking the Capitol; versus lawfully chanting for a change in US POLICIES — petitioning one’s own lawful government.
See, boys, how this works is… the California protestors today agree that this is a lawful government session, but it is not a moment when power is being transferred.
It is a deliberative moment — and thus appropriate for policy… discussions.
But you malign dorks knew that already; you’re just… congenital liars.
Charming.