Two Items, This Sunday: On Amazon — Canadian Labor, And US Lobbying…

From time to time, we check in on Mr. Bezos’ ongoing efforts to abuse the labor rights of various working people, on a global basis. That is our first story, today. The Canadian labor relations regulators have ruled that Amazon unlawfully retaliated against Vancouver BC area warehouse workers during contract negotiations, for the “offense” of voting in a… union.

Amazon stopped paying annual raises and bonuses, during the negotiations, while paying them out at all non-union shops. [There was a five year track record of annual raises and bonuses, in the facility — before unionization.] What an out of touch billionaire-putz this Bezos guy is — workers are teammates, and peers — not serfs, in the 21st Century. He needs a wake-up call. Here’s that, from Friday, at a Canadian outlet:

…Employees at Amazon’s Delta warehouse on Annacis Island will be getting some back pay following a B.C. Labour Relations Board ruling last month.

Jonathan Hanvelt, vice-chair of the board, said that Amazon contravened Sec. 45 (1) (b) of the Labour Relations Code.

That section says that wages and working conditions should remain unchanged during the time when talks for a first contract are underway at a newly certified operation…. one of those working conditions was regular, annual pay reviews and increases, which Amazon paid at its other locations, but missed in 2025 at the Delta location on Derwent Place because bargaining for a first contract with Unifor was underway….

[T]he LRB’s decision… points out that from 2020 to 2025, Amazon has provided yearly pay reviews and wage increases at its metro Vancouver locations. Hanvelt said the question was whether Amazon had breached Sec. 45 last September by not providing the 2025 pay increases to YVR2 that it had given at other locations….

“I find that this was a change from business as usual for the purposes of Section 45 and constitutes a breach of the Code,” Hanvelt wrote. Sec. 45 (1) (b), says that an employer can’t increase or decrease wages, or alter another term of employment, until either a new contract is signed or a year following certification, whatever comes first….

Now you know. Amazon’s 2025 lobby spend trends, next up — down here in the USA. Stay tuned, while the March Madness rumbles onward on your tee-vees. Heh.

नमस्ते

Oddly, The Evanston Reparations “Strike Suit” Will Rumble On, For A Few More Months. Disappointing — But Payments Are Regularly Going Out, Just The Same.

All of this — from Tom Fitton-affiliated loons — will never amount to a hill of beans. Everyone knows it — including USDC Judge Kness. But here we are, almost two years later… and it drags onward.

In my opinion, USDC Judge Kness could have — and should have — used common sense (embedded in the federal rules), to conserve court’s, and Evanston’s, resources in the face of such a spurious “strike” suit — and allowed a sworn question, one only (propounded by the City, to each of the supposed plaintiffs) — “Did you live in Evanston at any time, between… 2019 through 2026, inclusive?”

If the sworn answer came back as “no” [or as “I cannot prove that I did….”] — the entire lawsuit is at an end. They are bounced out, on their ears.

[Moreover, these plaintiffs will owe the city of Evanston the legal fees Evanston spent, in defending this clearly vexatious suit.]

But instead, Judge Kness will wait for “regular” discovery — where this same question and answer will generate this same result: dismissal of the Fitton acolytes. See this Friday order, then:

…Disputes over the merits, and consequently, the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ claims are best resolved through ordinary merits discovery, where the Court can benefit from a full factual record….

In this case, the City contends Plaintiffs’ complaint is… devoid of any allegations regarding the timing of Plaintiffs’ knowledge of the Program, whether they could have applied, or how they could have satisfied what Defendant claims were the Program’s residency and housing-related eligibility requirements. (Dkt. 13 ¶ 14.) Plaintiffs were not “able” to apply to the Program, the City maintains, because, although their relatives once lived in Evanston, nothing in Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that Plaintiffs live in or own property they intended to improve in Evanston….

Factual development in the ordinary course of this litigation may well bear out the truth of the City’s contention….

Well — this is a waste of time — as the City will surely establish, by discovery, that not one of these “recruited” plaintiffs live in Evanston (nor lived here in the past immediately before the program was adopted by Evanston), and that none of them were even aware of the program, until AFTER applications were closed. In sum, they were recruited by far right idiots like Tom Fitton, solely because they at one point had a WHYTE ancestor who’d lived in Evanston. Damn. What a waste of time — and money.

नमस्ते

Saturday Trivia — And “No Kings” — The Opposite Of Trivia…

Please do stand up for your right to live in a society governed by ordered liberty — a society ruled by laws, not men. That is entirely non-trivial, and requires all of us to… act.

And, in the most trivial of laughing “science experiments”, I can report (also at right) that I did not regress to some hominid in the tank yesterday afternoon, and I saw two great roundball games, last night at the United Center. Here’s the ACLU, in Chicago:

…Across the country, people are mobilizing to stand up for our democracy and against the Trump Administration’s abuse of power. On March 28, 2026 – the ACLU of Illinois will join Indivisible Chicago and partner organizations for a mass demonstration to defend our freedoms.

Join us on Saturday, March 28, 2026 at 1:30PM at Butler Field at Grant Park (East Jackson Drive & South Columbus Drive, Chicago, IL, 60603). We will be passing out posters, stickers, and know your rights cards on your way into the rally location. We will be at the Southeast corner of Michigan Avenue and Jackson Drive starting at 12:30PM. and encourage you to stop by to pick-up posters, stickers, and know your rights cards on your way into the rally location….

So now, on to the trains — to get together with likely 250,000 fellow believers in… freedom, from MAGA repression.

नमस्ते

EU Regulator Decides Against Tecovirimat SIGA, As An Mpox Therapeutic…

As we mentioned last month, the would-be treatment did no better than placebos, in animal models — CHMP has declared, at the EMA.

No double-blinded human trials were run, as there were too few Mpox patients (at the time) to evaluate it against.

The path of bio-science is inexorably littered with blind alley detours, as here.

Here’s all of that — from MedScape:

…The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended that Tecovirimat SIGA should no longer be used for the treatment of mpox.

A review of the antiviral medicine was initiated at the request of the European Commission following evidence from clinical trials suggesting a lack of effectiveness in the treatment of mpox. The CHMP’s decision does not affect the drugs other uses, including in the treatment of smallpox, cowpox, and complications from smallpox vaccines….

Onward, smiling — to a 90 minute isolation/flotation tank this afternoon [I will report here, scientifically if I am able to regress — to some primordial soup state(!)] — then the NCAAs tonight with buddies (at the United Center!), and “No Kings” again marching, down in the 40 degree Chi weather, tomorrow!

नमस्ते

In Which Mr. Obama Beats Me, Again…

I had selected Houston to win the national championship this year. Mr. Obama has Arizona. He also had Illinois to beat Houston, here in the Sweet 16. And that just happened.

I didn’t think the Illini could get by a tough Houston team. But they did.

Tonight’s game puts a fork in it for me — I have no chance of catching him now. Take me off the grill; I’m cooked.

So now over 21 years I’ve only beat him four times. 

I guess there’s always next year!

नमस्ते

[U] A Day Late On This… But Good News, For Rahway…

Updated @ 4 PM EDT: Well, at least one Leerink analyst feels that this proposal undervalues the portfolio of Terns’ onco-candidates — and he expects a bidding war / hostile topping offer to emerge. I am not too sure about that. End, updated portion.

Mr. Davis continues to position the company for the 2030s — and beyond. [There should be no problem clearing Hart-Scott on this deal.]

While I am still out of pocket, this did happen yesterday, and I wanted to note it:

…[Merck and Terns Pharma] today announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Merck, through a subsidiary, will acquire Terns for $53.00 per share in cash for an approximate equity value of $6.7 billion. This equates to approximately $5.7 billion net of acquired cash and represents an approximate premium of 31% to the 60-day and 42% to the 90-day volume-weighted average stock price on March 24, 2026.

“The acquisition of Terns builds on our growing presence in hematology with TERN-701, a potential best-in-class candidate for the treatment of certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia,” said Robert M. Davis, chairman and chief executive officer, Merck. “This transaction further diversifies and strengthens our position in oncology as we continue to look for opportunities to broaden our portfolio into other therapeutic areas….”

Now you know. Departing from Iowa’s med center in about six hours… grin.

नमस्ते

Catching Up, From Time Away — And Gone Again, Until Friday Morning… The First Cir. Freeze Decision.

Unsurprisingly, while I was in the Rockies, the First Circuit affirmed the decision we talked about in Rhode Island last Spring.

The DOGE / Tangerine “freezes” ran afoul of the APA. And the courts may both review that lawless action, and countermand it, thus:

…The Government thus appears to be of the view that, notwithstanding the APA’s presumption of reviewability, the limited statutory examples that it has put forth suffice to cast doubt on whether virtually any of the States’ APA claims target agency actions that can be reviewed under § 701(a)(2). Even if we were to accept that doubtful premise, however, we still would reject the Government’s position, given what Lincoln holds.

There, the Supreme Court held that the Indian Health Service’s decision to discontinue a program that provided services “to handicapped Indian children in the Southwest” was “‘committed to agency discretion by law.'” Lincoln, 508 U.S. at 184 (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2)). But the Supreme Court did so on the limited grounds that “[t]he allocation of funds from a lump-sum appropriation is [an] administrative decision traditiionally regarded as committed to agency discretion,” id. at 192, and the relevant statutes spoke “about Indian health only in general terms” and did “not so much as mention” the program at issue, id. at 194.

Thus, contrary to the Government’s suggestion, Lincoln did not address an agency’s discretion to withhold obligated funds.

It thus did not hold that agencies have unreviewable discretion to categorically stop disbursing obligated funds, such that they may indefinitely pause their disbursement of them in a categorical fashion….

Now you know. Onward, to… Iowa. Smile.

नमस्ते

Surprising: Some Honesty From Hinderaker, Tonight… On Iran.

John is finally accepting what everyone else has long known: Trump’s actual story is “the emperor’s new robes” — incarnate.

Hinderaker can see that many in the GOP are going to have to explain why they let Hegseth get so far off the chain — with no real command experience… and no clear strategy — in a war of choice — one with potentially nuclear implications, over a half a globe away. [The GOP cannot blame Trump, as they well-knew what a toddler he was — and is.] What a mess this all is.

Here’s all that — from John, and a bit of it:

Are we talking to the right people? Are we sure we know who the right people are? Are we really talking to anyone, or is Trump just trolling to sow confusion in the enemy’s ranks? Assuming talks are really taking place, is Trump negotiating from a position of strength, having devastated Iran’s military?

Or has the magnitude and persistence of Iran’s response surprised and dismayed Trump and his advisers, so that Trump is desperately looking for a way out?

I have absolutely no idea…

It is certainly correct that John has long had “no idea”.

And now he admits it likely that all of MAGA doesn’t either.

O U T.

Highly Mutated Version Of Covid Virus Now In The Wild In 23 Countries, And “Of Concern”: Not Clear The Existing Vaccines Will Work Against It.

This SARS-CoV-2 BA.3.2 variant is of significant concern — as an entirely new mRNA vaccine may need to be synthesized, in order to combat it.

The data is not yet in on it, in robust enough fashion to be sure — so we will keep an eye on it:

…The highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 BA.3.2 variant, which has been reported by at least 23 countries as of February 11, has been detected in nasal swabs collected from four US travelers, clinical samples from five patients, three airplane wastewater samples, and 132 wastewater surveillance samples from 25 states, per a study published last week in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

First identified in a respiratory sample in South Africa in November 2024, the strain has roughly 70 to 75 substitutions and deletions in the gene sequence of its spike protein relative to the JN.1 variant and its descendant, LP.8.1, the antigens used in the latest COVID-19 vaccines….

From November 2025 to January 2026, weekly BA.3.2 detections increased to about 30% of sequences in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands. The first US instance of BA.3.2 in a clinical specimen was documented on January 5, 2026. As of February 11, the strain’s prevalence among 2,579 total genetic sequences in national surveillance collected starting on December 1, 2025, was 0.19%….

As BA.3.2 mutations in the spike protein could reduce protection from a vaccination or infection, “continued genomic surveillance is needed to track SARS-CoV-2 evolution and determine its potential effect on public health,” they added….

We will keep a weather eye on the horizon, on this one. Trust that. Onward.

नमस्ते

Paul Seems To Think That “Greatness” Is Synonymous With “Unthinking Cruelty” — For Cruelty’s Sake. Not So.

Mirengoff this afternoon tells us we must “see it through” in Iran — even though he admits… his regime change (the objective he supported, in wild-eyed fashion, just two months ago) is no longer even remotely likely.

What Paul won’t admit is that Bibi conned or bullied the malign dotard Trump into this war of choice. And Paul well-knows, if Trump doesn’t now obliterate all of Iran’s ability to make war… it could be the end of Israel. That is true.

I might counter his non-stated underlying major premise by observing that Bibi may have sealed Israel’s fate — either way. Even after the entire nation of Iran is rubble, and all its uninformed soldiers have abandoned their posts, and left their rifles empty in the sand… there are certainly right now sleeper cells in Israel, in Tel Aviv — and perhaps even very near Mar-a-Lago.

Bibi and Trump have fallen into a quagmire they do not understand.

Paul writes that we are less than “great if we don’t keep dropping $6 billion in bombs a day, on Iran:

…[T]here should be no disagreement that if the U.S. ceases military activity in Iran because the conflict has caused high gas prices, that will be strong evidence that America is not great. Great nations do not give up on their military objectives because pursuing them is leading temporarily to higher prices….

Paul’s purported “analysis” is… transparently silly. Rather than grappling with the legitimacy or lack of it, of the whole operation, he simply assumes Trump was right — or more precisely, that Bibi was.

If the goal was illegitimate (and it was!), then deciding that now over 20 dead US soldiers is 20 too many — or deciding (correctly) that Trump was Bibi’s clown here… either or both, or higher gas prices… would be, and is plenty of reason to just walk away.

The Strait will reopen; gas prices will fall… and Bibi may well be cooked, either way.

Paul assumes that this was one of the conflicts John F. Kennedy would have paid “any price” to win, in 1961.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

This was a grave mistake. One that will define Trumpism, forever in history — as the Know Nuthin’s… rebirthed.

O U T.