Earlier in March, the Chicago USDC Judge Kness ruled that these Fitton affiliated jokers could be subject to discovery, about where they live — to prove they have no standing to even reach the courthouse door, to bring this suit, and thus the court will dump them.

Now that — as of Friday past, the city’s Answer-at-Law has been filed — the city may order up depositions of each named plaintiff, and force them to answer under oath whether they ever lived in the city. If they were aware that the city, until 1969 had a “red-lining” ordinance that prohibited selling homes to people of color, in certain neighborhoods in that city. [In ’69, my mother in law passed an ordinance outlawing this reprehensible practice — but it was enforced prior thereto by law. Thus proof of discrimination on race was embedded in the municipal code, and enforced by the revocation of brokerage licenses — in the case of attempted transgressions. Deeds would not be recorded, for completed sales. These are all facts of the historical record here.] And Fitton, and his jokers — think that they may erase these actual facts — with lies, and play the whyte victims, while living in god-knows-where / Florida, and elsewhere. [What a laughable handful of hapless “crisis actors”.] The idea that these odious, immoral strangers should have any say, here (without paying real estate taxes, or even living here and paying sales taxes) in what we — and our civic leaders — have voted to do here, is… preposterous.

So… most of all, the sworn depos will prove these morons cannot even suggest they ever would be eligible — since none of their ancestors would have been harmed by the pre-1969 laws. Because none of them lived here, and none were… Black. Or Brown. Or Yellow.

So this whole nonsense “whyte entitlement federal suit” is completely… upside down. It will be gone, and just as soon as these people are put under oath. Then each of them will be jointly and severally liable to pay my city’s out of pocket legal fees and expenses, due to their bad faith abuse of the the federal court system — for racist / political talking points. Thus — the conclusion of the Answer, as filed:

…Defendant City of Evanston respectfully requests that this Court:

1. Deny class certification;

2. Enter judgment in favor of Evanston on all claims;

3. Deny all relief requested by Plaintiffs, including declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages;

4. Award Evanston its costs and attorney’s fees; and

5. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: May 8, 2026….

All the best, to all the mothers — far and wide… smile.

नमस्ते