Bill Otis Was A Prosecutor, Allegedly. He Well-Knows This Timing Was Solely Trump’s Doing.

Bill Otis tonight openly lies, to try to save Tangerine from an increasingly likely defeat in about 32 days.

The central lie Bill tells, is that he blames a very capable federal District Court judge for applying the federal criminal law as it is written.

He blames Judge Chutkan for treating Tangerine the same as any other now convicted felon — who, by his own choice, delayed the proceedings in DC while he fought criminal proceedings in New York City.

That is, she has respected the long-standing Constitutional mandate — under our First Amendment, which states that “we the people” are entitled to know how our criminal courts function, and the press is entitled to report on all felony matters – as public records, including describing and reviewing the evidence from indictments that have been handed down against already convicted felons. [That is exactly where Trump finds himself, all due to his own criminal choices, stretching across decades. And Bill very well know this.]

So it is Trump alone — who is responsible for the fact that all this evidence has become public just about a month before America will cast its ballots.

No other convicted felon has ever been able to hide subsequent indictments, and the associated evidence, from public view — for any reason whatsoever, let alone that the felon churlishly decided to run for office (again!), back in 2022. There is no right to run for high office free of your criminal entanglements, there is only the privilege to run for office, and to accept with the exercise of that privilege… that “the criminal law does what it does.” [Bill will recall that DC Mayor Marion Barry is Exhibit A for that notion!]

In sum, if you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen. Or… don’t commit felonies in the first place.

Personally, I believe this is exactly how a democracy should work: we the people, reading for ourselves, should be allowed to evaluate the evidence in a felony case that bears directly on whether he would faithfully serve and protect us all — if granted had a second term.

If he feels that the Special Counsel’s sworn evidence is too one-sided, he is absolutely free to release all his “exonerating evidence” — to the public. [But we all know there is almost none of that.]

So instead, Bill Otis here conjures up a BS political charge — against a federal court judge of high morals, and impeccable standing. He should be ashamed of himself.

Damnation. Out.