Again, he and his boys apparently cannot accept what the Supremes have actually ruled… is the law on EEO matters.
So he makes claims that the decisions do not support, to argue that directors and officers of public companies may be personally liable, if their so-called “DEI” efforts are beyond what the Supremes will countenance.
Poppycock.
Every COMPETENT corporate lawyer for ’34 Act companies can read the decisions for themselves, and can offer reasoned opinions that it is more likely than not… that hiring and promotion decisions are (always were, and will always be)… made based on a myriad of factors — including the under-represented viewpoints, in ’34 Act company board-rooms across America — to reach the companies’ customers.
So again — Paul tries to tell corporate board members that there is “a monster under their beds…” — a monster called “personal liability“. Hilarious.
Indeed, so long as reputable firms offer them legal advice that their course of conduct is more likely than not… lawful (and it is!)… Paul’s monster is… a figment of his (apparently considerable) imagination.
Onward, grinning.
Powerline Lies... 