I do not intend to spend many electrons on what a guy who thinks the US president is a king… thinks.
US Presidents are… pretty much the opposite of kings. [We actually held a little tea party / set of skirmishes… to resolve that… it was in the Hartford Courant, and such.]
Anyhoo — just because this guy McCarthy is the favored establishment GOP talking head on matters criminal… means very little — in fact, perhaps less than zero, even if he is not a Trump fan. [He’s not.]
His stepping off point is that he (in direct opposition to the Supremes) thinks the president is bound by nearly no “ordinary” law. But 18 USC § 793 was written specifically to apply to… yep… presidents.
It has never been challenged as unconstitutional, primarily because we the people… never had need of it — to use it against any current- or former- president, for stealing nuclear weapons secrets. [That statement alone refutes all either or both of these two (plus John Hinderaker and Steve Hayward) wrote — or will ever… write, in opposition.]
Thus, assuming that 18 USC § 793 is constitutional (it is, else-wise no traitorous, corrupt president could ever be reined in), all of McCarthy’s remaining claims amount to just sound and fury, signifying… nothing.
McCarthy is right about one thing, though — any salient documents recovered by these subpeonas and/or warrants, WILL be evidence in both the J6 matters, and Thomas Barrack’s September 2022 felony trial. Stay tuned.
There is noting Tangerine (or Barrack) can do about that.
See ya’ Scottie.
Powerline Lies... 